CTTAF
Price
$81.93
Change
-$2.02 (-2.41%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
16.01B
VLEEY
Price
$5.43
Change
+$0.14 (+2.65%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.5B
26 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTAF vs VLEEY

Header iconCTTAF vs VLEEY Comparison
Open Charts CTTAF vs VLEEYBanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$81.93
Change-$2.02 (-2.41%)
Volume$2.71K
Capitalization16.01B
Valeo SE
Price$5.43
Change+$0.14 (+2.65%)
Volume$13.96K
Capitalization5.5B
CTTAF vs VLEEY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLEEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAF vs. VLEEY commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAF is a Hold and VLEEY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAF: $85.31 vs. VLEEY: $5.63)
Brand notoriety: CTTAF and VLEEY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAF: 50% vs. VLEEY: 61%
Market capitalization -- CTTAF: $16.01B vs. VLEEY: $5.5B
CTTAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $16.01B. VLEEY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $5.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLEEY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VLEEY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLEEY is a better buy in the long-term than CTTAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLEEY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VLEEY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLEEY is a better buy in the short-term than CTTAF.

Price Growth

CTTAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.35% price change this week, while VLEEY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +7.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

VLEEY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+3.25% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAF($16B) has a higher market cap than VLEEY($5.5B). CTTAF has higher P/E ratio than VLEEY: CTTAF (68.03) vs VLEEY (21.55). VLEEY YTD gains are higher at: 30.784 vs. CTTAF (24.951). CTTAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.19B vs. VLEEY (2.49B). CTTAF has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. VLEEY (1.76B). VLEEY has less debt than CTTAF: VLEEY (6.27B) vs CTTAF (8.01B). CTTAF has higher revenues than VLEEY: CTTAF (40.4B) vs VLEEY (20B).
CTTAFVLEEYCTTAF / VLEEY
Capitalization16B5.5B291%
EBITDA4.19B2.49B168%
Gain YTD24.95130.78481%
P/E Ratio68.0321.55316%
Revenue40.4B20B202%
Total Cash2.38B1.76B135%
Total Debt8.01B6.27B128%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAF vs VLEEY: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAF
VLEEY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6062
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
7297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VLEEY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAF (15). This means that VLEEY’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

VLEEY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAF (100). This means that VLEEY’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAF's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as VLEEY (97). This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to VLEEY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as VLEEY (44). This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to VLEEY’s over the last 12 months.

VLEEY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAF (70). This means that VLEEY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTAFVLEEY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLEEY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FICHX13.57N/A
N/A
Cantor Fitzgerald Large Cap Fcs Cl Inst
FSKLX12.56N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Intl Low Volatil Idx
VYMSX19.36N/A
N/A
Voya Mid Cap Research Enhanced Index I
MACCX16.77N/A
N/A
MoA Catholic Values Index Fund Class
GIIZX13.76N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Intl Eq Idx Investor

CTTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAF has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAF jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAF
1D Price
Change %
CTTAF100%
+4.14%
CTTAY - CTTAF
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.73%
VLEEY - CTTAF
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.68%
MGA - CTTAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
VC - CTTAF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
LEA - CTTAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
More

VLEEY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLEEY has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VLEEY jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLEEY
1D Price
Change %
VLEEY100%
+3.68%
CTTAY - VLEEY
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.73%
ALV - VLEEY
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
MGA - VLEEY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
AXL - VLEEY
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
VC - VLEEY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More