It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTTAY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTTAY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +9.83% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -2.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.94%.
CTTAY is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
LEA is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
CTTAY | LEA | CTTAY / LEA | |
Capitalization | 16B | 8.26B | 194% |
EBITDA | 4.19B | 1.48B | 282% |
Gain YTD | -19.128 | -31.025 | 62% |
P/E Ratio | 69.93 | 14.91 | 469% |
Revenue | 40.4B | 23.5B | 172% |
Total Cash | 2.38B | 1.2B | 199% |
Total Debt | 8.01B | 2.92B | 274% |
CTTAY | LEA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTTAY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (16) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
CTTAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's SMR Rating (63) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAY (77) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.
CTTAY's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (81) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
CTTAY's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LEA (88) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than LEA’s over the last 12 months.
CTTAY | LEA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago65% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago65% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 5 days ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago68% | 3 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago71% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTTAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTTAY | 100% | +3.29% | ||
VLEEY - CTTAY | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.86% | ||
CTTAF - CTTAY | 59% Loosely correlated | +7.90% | ||
MGDDY - CTTAY | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
ALV - CTTAY | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
LEA - CTTAY | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.