CTTAY
Price
$6.86
Change
+$0.09 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.01B
46 days until earnings call
MGDDY
Price
$16.86
Change
+$0.20 (+1.20%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
23.43B
24 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CTTAY vs MGDDY

Header iconCTTAY vs MGDDY Comparison
Open Charts CTTAY vs MGDDYBanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$6.86
Change+$0.09 (+1.33%)
Volume$56.58K
Capitalization16.01B
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
Price$16.86
Change+$0.20 (+1.20%)
Volume$1.36M
Capitalization23.43B
CTTAY vs MGDDY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGDDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAY vs. MGDDY commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAY is a Hold and MGDDY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAY: $6.86 vs. MGDDY: $16.86)
Brand notoriety: CTTAY and MGDDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAY: 24% vs. MGDDY: 231%
Market capitalization -- CTTAY: $16.01B vs. MGDDY: $23.43B
CTTAY [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $16.01B. MGDDY’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $23.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGDDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGDDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTTAY is a better buy in the long-term than MGDDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGDDY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • MGDDY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTTAY is a better buy in the short-term than MGDDY.

Price Growth

CTTAY (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +4.89% price change this week, while MGDDY (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +6.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

CTTAY is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

MGDDY is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.51% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGDDY($23.4B) has a higher market cap than CTTAY($16B). CTTAY has higher P/E ratio than MGDDY: CTTAY (69.93) vs MGDDY (8.90). CTTAY YTD gains are higher at: 3.782 vs. MGDDY (2.868). MGDDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.41B vs. CTTAY (4.19B). MGDDY has more cash in the bank: 3.42B vs. CTTAY (2.38B). MGDDY (7.95B) and CTTAY (8.01B) have identical debt. CTTAY has higher revenues than MGDDY: CTTAY (40.4B) vs MGDDY (29.4B).
CTTAYMGDDYCTTAY / MGDDY
Capitalization16B23.4B68%
EBITDA4.19B5.41B77%
Gain YTD3.7822.868132%
P/E Ratio69.938.90786%
Revenue40.4B29.4B137%
Total Cash2.38B3.42B70%
Total Debt8.01B7.95B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAY vs MGDDY: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAY
MGDDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10060
SMR RATING
1..100
7895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3861
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGDDY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTAY (16). This means that MGDDY’s stock grew similarly to CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

MGDDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAY (100). This means that MGDDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDY (95). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDY (57). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAY's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MGDDY (61). This means that CTTAY’s stock grew similarly to MGDDY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTAYMGDDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTTAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGDDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WIGRX95.780.73
+0.77%
Wasatch Core Growth Institutional
EIVIX13.770.07
+0.51%
Allspring Special Large Cap Value Inst
DPTRX37.290.19
+0.51%
BNY Mellon Tax Managed Growth I
MBNBX30.570.08
+0.26%
NYLI Balanced Class B
RALOX10.18N/A
N/A
Lazard Real Assets Open

CTTAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAY
1D Price
Change %
CTTAY100%
+1.33%
VLEEY - CTTAY
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
CTTAF - CTTAY
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.83%
MGDDY - CTTAY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.20%
ALV - CTTAY
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
LEA - CTTAY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
More

MGDDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGDDY has been loosely correlated with VLEEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGDDY jumps, then VLEEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGDDY
1D Price
Change %
MGDDY100%
+1.20%
VLEEY - MGDDY
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
LEA - MGDDY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
CTTAY - MGDDY
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
MGA - MGDDY
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
ADNT - MGDDY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More