CTTOF
Price
$9.10
Change
-$0.30 (-3.19%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
563.71M
MFGHF
Price
$39.60
Change
+$4.60 (+13.14%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.21B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTOF vs MFGHF

Header iconCTTOF vs MFGHF Comparison
Open Charts CTTOF vs MFGHFBanner chart's image
CTT Correios Portugal SA
Price$9.10
Change-$0.30 (-3.19%)
Volume$717
Capitalization563.71M
Mainfreight
Price$39.60
Change+$4.60 (+13.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.21B
CTTOF vs MFGHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTTOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFGHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTOF vs. MFGHF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTOF is a Hold and MFGHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTOF: $9.10 vs. MFGHF: $39.60)
Brand notoriety: CTTOF and MFGHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTOF: 8% vs. MFGHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTTOF: $563.71M vs. MFGHF: $4.21B
CTTOF [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $563.71M. MFGHF’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $4.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $126.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $13.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFGHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFGHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTTOF is a better buy in the long-term than MFGHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFGHF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MFGHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFGHF is a better buy in the short-term than CTTOF.

Price Growth

CTTOF (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -3.19% price change this week, while MFGHF (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (-1.29% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MFGHF($4.21B) has a higher market cap than CTTOF($564M). MFGHF has higher P/E ratio than CTTOF: MFGHF (17.24) vs CTTOF (10.83). CTTOF YTD gains are higher at: 99.125 vs. MFGHF (0.633). MFGHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 831M vs. CTTOF (75.3M). CTTOF has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. MFGHF (140M). MFGHF has less debt than CTTOF: MFGHF (827M) vs CTTOF (3.01B). MFGHF has higher revenues than CTTOF: MFGHF (5.95B) vs CTTOF (896M).
CTTOFMFGHFCTTOF / MFGHF
Capitalization564M4.21B13%
EBITDA75.3M831M9%
Gain YTD99.1250.63315,665%
P/E Ratio10.8317.2463%
Revenue896M5.95B15%
Total Cash1.04B140M744%
Total Debt3.01B827M364%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTOF vs MFGHF: Fundamental Ratings
CTTOF
MFGHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9945
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2568
SMR RATING
1..100
5087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
787
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTTOF's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as MFGHF (73). This means that CTTOF’s stock grew similarly to MFGHF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFGHF (68). This means that CTTOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFGHF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTOF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFGHF (87). This means that CTTOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFGHF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTOF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as MFGHF (60). This means that CTTOF’s stock grew similarly to MFGHF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTOF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MFGHF (87). This means that CTTOF’s stock grew significantly faster than MFGHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTOFMFGHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTTOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFGHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMPCX34.970.08
+0.23%
American Funds AMCAP C
MFVZX17.29N/A
N/A
MassMutual Equity Opports I
HIBCX53.55N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation HLS IB
MFOCX32.15N/A
N/A
Marsico Focus
BTEEX14.96N/A
N/A
Baron Technology Retail

CTTOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTTOF and JANL have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTTOF and JANL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTOF
1D Price
Change %
CTTOF100%
N/A
JANL - CTTOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPSTF - CTTOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSTIY - CTTOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MFGHF - CTTOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KHNGF - CTTOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFGHF and KHNGF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFGHF and KHNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFGHF
1D Price
Change %
MFGHF100%
N/A
KHNGF - MFGHF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DPSTF - MFGHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KHNGY - MFGHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
OSTIY - MFGHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTTOF - MFGHF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More