CTTZF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
208.39M
SFRRF
Price
$7.40
Change
+$0.85 (+12.98%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.39B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTZF vs SFRRF

Header iconCTTZF vs SFRRF Comparison
Open Charts CTTZF vs SFRRFBanner chart's image
Centaurus Metals
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$82.08K
Capitalization208.39M
Sandfire Resources NL
Price$7.40
Change+$0.85 (+12.98%)
Volume$509
Capitalization2.39B
CTTZF vs SFRRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTZF vs. SFRRF commentary
Jun 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTZF is a Hold and SFRRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTZF: $0.26 vs. SFRRF: $7.40)
Brand notoriety: CTTZF and SFRRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTZF: 72% vs. SFRRF: 47%
Market capitalization -- CTTZF: $208.39M vs. SFRRF: $2.39B
CTTZF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $208.39M. SFRRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSFRRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SFRRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFRRF is a better buy in the long-term than CTTZF.

Price Growth

CTTZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while SFRRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +12.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.88%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.80% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFRRF($2.39B) has a higher market cap than CTTZF($208M). SFRRF YTD gains are higher at: 18.211 vs. CTTZF (12.231). SFRRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 261M vs. CTTZF (-29.74M). SFRRF has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. CTTZF (8.26M). CTTZF has less debt than SFRRF: CTTZF (116K) vs SFRRF (597M).
CTTZFSFRRFCTTZF / SFRRF
Capitalization208M2.39B9%
EBITDA-29.74M261M-11%
Gain YTD12.23118.21167%
P/E RatioN/A13.11-
RevenueN/A770M-
Total Cash8.26M142M6%
Total Debt116K597M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTZF vs SFRRF: Fundamental Ratings
CTTZF
SFRRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8349
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10026
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SFRRF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTZF (55). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTZF’s over the last 12 months.

SFRRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTZF (83). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTZF’s over the last 12 months.

SFRRF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTZF (95). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew similarly to CTTZF’s over the last 12 months.

SFRRF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTZF (58). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew similarly to CTTZF’s over the last 12 months.

SFRRF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTTZF (100). This means that SFRRF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTTZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBAC231.891.65
+0.72%
SBA Communications Corp
ALCO32.250.01
+0.03%
Alico
MATW21.45-0.48
-2.19%
Matthews International Corp
SLNO73.35-2.27
-3.00%
Soleno Therapeutics
XELB2.35-0.22
-8.56%
Xcel Brands Inc

CTTZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTTZF and YLLXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTTZF and YLLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTZF
1D Price
Change %
CTTZF100%
-1.32%
YLLXF - CTTZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
WRSLF - CTTZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RIGMF - CTTZF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLROF - CTTZF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFRRF - CTTZF
11%
Poorly correlated
+12.98%
More