CTTZF vs SLROF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTZF is a Hold and SLROF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTTZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLROF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CTTZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SLROF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CTTZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.17% price change this week, while SLROF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| CTTZF | SLROF | CTTZF / SLROF | |
| Capitalization | 208M | 12.2M | 1,705% |
| EBITDA | -29.74M | -3.95M | 752% |
| Gain YTD | -23.690 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 864 | - |
| Total Cash | 8.26M | 5.41M | 153% |
| Total Debt | 116K | 5.88K | 1,973% |
CTTZF | SLROF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTTZF's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SLROF (89). This means that CTTZF’s stock grew similarly to SLROF’s over the last 12 months.
CTTZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SLROF (100). This means that CTTZF’s stock grew similarly to SLROF’s over the last 12 months.
SLROF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTZF (96). This means that SLROF’s stock grew similarly to CTTZF’s over the last 12 months.
SLROF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CTTZF (63). This means that SLROF’s stock grew similarly to CTTZF’s over the last 12 months.
SLROF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTZF (100). This means that SLROF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTZF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| FOREX / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HKDCHF | 0.11 | 0.00 | +2.32% |
| Hong Kong Dollar - Switzerland Franc | |||
| FGIOX | 45.15 | -0.33 | -0.73% |
| Fidelity Advisor Growth & Income I | |||
| LRSOX | 23.86 | -0.21 | -0.87% |
| Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F3 | |||
| RVVHX | 11.06 | -0.13 | -1.16% |
| Royce Small-Cap Value Investment | |||
| RUBCHF | 0.01 | -0.00 | -1.60% |
| Russia Ruble - Switzerland Franc | |||
CTTZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CTTZF and YLLXF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTTZF and YLLXF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTTZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTTZF | 100% | -4.11% | ||
| YLLXF - CTTZF | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| WRSLF - CTTZF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RIGMF - CTTZF | 21% Poorly correlated | +6.73% | ||
| SYAXF - CTTZF | 12% Poorly correlated | -8.88% | ||
| SLROF - CTTZF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SLROF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLROF has been loosely correlated with NWXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLROF jumps, then NWXPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLROF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLROF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NWXPF - SLROF | 42% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GPHOF - SLROF | 34% Loosely correlated | +3.35% | ||
| MMTLF - SLROF | 32% Poorly correlated | +8.10% | ||
| PGXPF - SLROF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SIERF - SLROF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||