CTUNF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.03 (+60.00%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
18.67M
EDESY
Price
$19.73
Change
-$4.77 (-19.47%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
919.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTUNF vs EDESY

Header iconCTUNF vs EDESY Comparison
Open Charts CTUNF vs EDESYBanner chart's image
Clean Seas Seafood
Price$0.08
Change+$0.03 (+60.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization18.67M
Elders
Price$19.73
Change-$4.77 (-19.47%)
Volume$200
Capitalization919.05M
CTUNF vs EDESY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDESY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTUNF vs. EDESY commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTUNF is a StrongBuy and EDESY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CTUNF: $0.08 vs. EDESY: $19.15)
Brand notoriety: CTUNF and EDESY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTUNF: 100% vs. EDESY: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTUNF: $18.67M vs. EDESY: $919.05M
CTUNF [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] is valued at $18.67M. EDESY’s [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] market capitalization is $919.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry ranges from $34.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Agricultural Commodities/Milling] industry is $2.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTUNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEDESY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTUNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EDESY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EDESY is a better buy in the long-term than CTUNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTUNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EDESY’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTUNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • EDESY’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTUNF is a better buy in the short-term than EDESY.

Price Growth

CTUNF (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EDESY (@Agricultural Commodities/Milling) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Agricultural Commodities/Milling (+0.96% weekly)

The Agricultural Commodities/Milling industry includes companies that are involved in farming activities, such as crop production, livestock management and animal feed, for commercial purposes. The industry includes a wide range of operations from growing corn, to grain and oilseed processing to the operation of flour mills. Changes in consumer tastes is one of the critical factors influencing what products are grown and raised in this industry. Potential risks to the business include climate change and fluctuations in global prices of agricultural products. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Elanco Animal Health, Inc., Bunge Limited and Canopy Growth Corporation are some of the biggest U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EDESY($919M) has a higher market cap than CTUNF($18.7M). CTUNF YTD gains are higher at: 60.000 vs. EDESY (-19.459). EDESY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 198M vs. CTUNF (-35.52M). EDESY has higher revenues than CTUNF: EDESY (3.19B) vs CTUNF (65.2M).
CTUNFEDESYCTUNF / EDESY
Capitalization18.7M919M2%
EBITDA-35.52M198M-18%
Gain YTD60.000-19.459-308%
P/E RatioN/A15.31-
Revenue65.2M3.19B2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTUNF vs EDESY: Fundamental Ratings
CTUNF
EDESY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2845
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5482
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
430

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EDESY's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTUNF (65). This means that EDESY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

EDESY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTUNF (100). This means that EDESY’s stock grew similarly to CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

EDESY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTUNF (100). This means that EDESY’s stock grew similarly to CTUNF’s over the last 12 months.

CTUNF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as EDESY (82). This means that CTUNF’s stock grew similarly to EDESY’s over the last 12 months.

CTUNF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EDESY (100). This means that CTUNF’s stock grew similarly to EDESY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTUNFEDESY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTUNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EDESY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JEMSX36.84N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity I
FAFCX36.09N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Financials C
VNVYX26.04N/A
N/A
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Y
GVALX15.16N/A
N/A
Gotham Large Value Institutional
JMCVX16.44-0.05
-0.30%
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value T

CTUNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTUNF and AGRO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTUNF and AGRO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTUNF
1D Price
Change %
CTUNF100%
N/A
AGRO - CTUNF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
DOLE - CTUNF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
AGRI - CTUNF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
DTCK - CTUNF
3%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
EDESY - CTUNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EDESY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EDESY has been loosely correlated with KUBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EDESY jumps, then KUBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EDESY
1D Price
Change %
EDESY100%
N/A
KUBR - EDESY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
RSSFF - EDESY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHPFF - EDESY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GARPF - EDESY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HERB - EDESY
2%
Poorly correlated
+14.81%
More