CTUY
Price
$37.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
47.75M
TVLF
Price
$7.15
Change
+$0.59 (+8.99%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

CTUY vs TVLF

Header iconCTUY vs TVLF Comparison
Open Charts CTUY vs TVLFBanner chart's image
Century Next Financial
Price$37.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$134
Capitalization47.75M
Tennessee Valley Financial Holdings
Price$7.15
Change+$0.59 (+8.99%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
CTUY vs TVLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTUY vs. TVLF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTUY is a Hold and TVLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CTUY: $37.50 vs. TVLF: $7.15)
Brand notoriety: CTUY and TVLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTUY: 24% vs. TVLF: 203%
Market capitalization -- CTUY: $47.75M vs. TVLF: $0
CTUY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.75M. TVLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTUY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTVLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTUY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TVLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TVLF is a better buy in the long-term than CTUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTUY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TVLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTUY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TVLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TVLF is a better buy in the short-term than CTUY.

Price Growth

CTUY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while TVLF (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTUY YTD gains are higher at: -2.344 vs. TVLF (-2.589).
CTUYTVLFCTUY / TVLF
Capitalization47.8MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.344-2.58991%
P/E Ratio9.02N/A-
Revenue25.8MN/A-
Total Cash8.43MN/A-
Total Debt14.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTUY vs TVLF: Fundamental Ratings
CTUY
TVLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4233
SMR RATING
1..100
4451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8140
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TVLF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTUY (51). This means that TVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTUY’s over the last 12 months.

TVLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as CTUY (42). This means that TVLF’s stock grew similarly to CTUY’s over the last 12 months.

CTUY's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as TVLF (51). This means that CTUY’s stock grew similarly to TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

CTUY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as TVLF (47). This means that CTUY’s stock grew similarly to TVLF’s over the last 12 months.

TVLF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTUY (81). This means that TVLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTUY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTUYTVLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TVLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSPRX21.850.31
+1.44%
Morgan Stanley Inst Advantage C
NPNEX46.260.33
+0.72%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value E
OCLVX18.910.08
+0.42%
Optimum Large Cap Value C
SSTFX10.810.04
+0.37%
Virtus KAR Capital Growth C
DENVX10.960.04
+0.37%
MassMutual Disciplined Value Svc

CTUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTUY and TVLF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTUY and TVLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTUY
1D Price
Change %
CTUY100%
N/A
TVLF - CTUY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PVBK - CTUY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
HMLN - CTUY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSBB - CTUY
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.58%
CYSM - CTUY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TVLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TVLF and BWAGF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TVLF and BWAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TVLF
1D Price
Change %
TVLF100%
N/A
BWAGF - TVLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTUY - TVLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TYCB - TVLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBWC - TVLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMAK - TVLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More