CTXAF
Price
$16.30
Change
+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.25B
NZRFF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.15 (-13.04%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
343.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXAF vs NZRFF

Header iconCTXAF vs NZRFF Comparison
Open Charts CTXAF vs NZRFFBanner chart's image
Ampol
Price$16.30
Change+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Volume$750
Capitalization5.25B
CHANNEL INFRASTRUCTURE NZ
Price$1.00
Change-$0.15 (-13.04%)
Volume$2.77K
Capitalization343.35M
CTXAF vs NZRFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTXAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NZRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXAF vs. NZRFF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXAF is a Hold and NZRFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXAF: $16.30 vs. NZRFF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: CTXAF and NZRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXAF: 17% vs. NZRFF: 170%
Market capitalization -- CTXAF: $5.25B vs. NZRFF: $343.35M
CTXAF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $5.25B. NZRFF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $343.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNZRFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NZRFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NZRFF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NZRFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • NZRFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CTXAF and NZRFF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CTXAF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NZRFF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -13.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+2.59% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTXAF($5.25B) has a higher market cap than NZRFF($343M). NZRFF has higher P/E ratio than CTXAF: NZRFF (21.03) vs CTXAF (10.16). CTXAF YTD gains are higher at: 1.875 vs. NZRFF (-12.292). CTXAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. NZRFF (-670.35M). CTXAF has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. NZRFF (16.1M). NZRFF has less debt than CTXAF: NZRFF (202M) vs CTXAF (3.61B). CTXAF has higher revenues than NZRFF: CTXAF (38.2B) vs NZRFF (215M).
CTXAFNZRFFCTXAF / NZRFF
Capitalization5.25B343M1,531%
EBITDA1.49B-670.35M-222%
Gain YTD1.875-12.292-15%
P/E Ratio10.1621.0348%
Revenue38.2B215M17,767%
Total Cash126M16.1M783%
Total Debt3.61B202M1,789%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXAF vs NZRFF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXAF
NZRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4998
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6947
SMR RATING
1..100
9790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5763
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
333
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5546

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NZRFF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (45). This means that NZRFF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

NZRFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (69). This means that NZRFF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

NZRFF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (97). This means that NZRFF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as NZRFF (63). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to NZRFF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as NZRFF (33). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to NZRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXAFNZRFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTXAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NZRFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWMFX64.060.53
+0.83%
American Funds Washington Mutual 529F1
FEAMX15.500.10
+0.65%
First Eagle Rising Dividend Fund C
RAPCX10.80N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
JABZX10.51N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Environmental Opps A
DEVLX66.03N/A
N/A
Macquarie Small Cap Value A

CTXAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAF and CLSZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAF and CLSZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXAF
1D Price
Change %
CTXAF100%
N/A
CLSZF - CTXAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIY - CTXAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
PKIUF - CTXAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
HEOL - CTXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - CTXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More

NZRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NZRFF and SPTJF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NZRFF and SPTJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NZRFF
1D Price
Change %
NZRFF100%
N/A
SPTJF - NZRFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - NZRFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
MOHCF - NZRFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXAF - NZRFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIF - NZRFF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More