CTXAF
Price
$16.30
Change
+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.25B
RUBSF
Price
$33.31
Change
+$0.43 (+1.31%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXAF vs RUBSF

Header iconCTXAF vs RUBSF Comparison
Open Charts CTXAF vs RUBSFBanner chart's image
Ampol
Price$16.30
Change+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Volume$750
Capitalization5.25B
RUBIS
Price$33.31
Change+$0.43 (+1.31%)
Volume$165
Capitalization2.55B
CTXAF vs RUBSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXAF vs. RUBSF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXAF is a Hold and RUBSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXAF: $16.30 vs. RUBSF: $33.31)
Brand notoriety: CTXAF and RUBSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXAF: 100% vs. RUBSF: 7%
Market capitalization -- CTXAF: $5.25B vs. RUBSF: $2.55B
CTXAF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $5.25B. RUBSF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $2.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $8.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUBSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RUBSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CTXAF and RUBSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RUBSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RUBSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CTXAF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RUBSF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +1.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (-1.10% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTXAF($5.25B) has a higher market cap than RUBSF($2.55B). CTXAF has higher P/E ratio than RUBSF: CTXAF (10.16) vs RUBSF (9.01). RUBSF YTD gains are higher at: 40.549 vs. CTXAF (1.875). CTXAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. RUBSF (612M). RUBSF has more cash in the bank: 785M vs. CTXAF (126M). RUBSF has less debt than CTXAF: RUBSF (2.43B) vs CTXAF (3.61B). CTXAF has higher revenues than RUBSF: CTXAF (38.2B) vs RUBSF (5.83B).
CTXAFRUBSFCTXAF / RUBSF
Capitalization5.25B2.55B206%
EBITDA1.49B612M244%
Gain YTD1.87540.5495%
P/E Ratio10.169.01113%
Revenue38.2B5.83B655%
Total Cash126M785M16%
Total Debt3.61B2.43B149%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXAF vs RUBSF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXAF
RUBSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4850
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
9761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
527
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTXAF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUBSF (89). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBSF (100). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

RUBSF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXAF (97). This means that RUBSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

RUBSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (57). This means that RUBSF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as RUBSF (27). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to RUBSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXAFRUBSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RUBSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RICFX64.220.37
+0.58%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R5
VALSX36.790.07
+0.19%
Value Line Select Growth Fund
OCMGX20.30N/A
N/A
OCM Gold Investor
BDSCX17.48N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Small Cap Core Inv C
ETADX19.44N/A
N/A
Eventide Dividend Growth A

CTXAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAF and NTOIY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAF and NTOIY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXAF
1D Price
Change %
CTXAF100%
N/A
NTOIY - CTXAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
PKIUF - CTXAF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
HEOL - CTXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - CTXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
RUBSF - CTXAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
More

RUBSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBSF and IDKOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBSF and IDKOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUBSF
1D Price
Change %
RUBSF100%
+1.31%
IDKOF - RUBSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - RUBSF
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
PKIUF - RUBSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
CTXAF - RUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OILRF - RUBSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More