CTXDF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
16.14M
DAUGF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXDF vs DAUGF

Header iconCTXDF vs DAUGF Comparison
Open Charts CTXDF vs DAUGFBanner chart's image
Cantex Mine Development
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41.5K
Capitalization16.14M
Desert Gold Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.3K
Capitalization12.76M
CTXDF vs DAUGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXDF vs. DAUGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXDF is a Hold and DAUGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXDF: $0.12 vs. DAUGF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CTXDF and DAUGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXDF: 138% vs. DAUGF: 66%
Market capitalization -- CTXDF: $16.14M vs. DAUGF: $12.76M
CTXDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $16.14M. DAUGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDAUGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CTXDF and DAUGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAUGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DAUGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTXDF is a better buy in the short-term than DAUGF.

Price Growth

CTXDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while DAUGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTXDF($16.1M) has a higher market cap than DAUGF($12.8M). CTXDF YTD gains are higher at: 62.116 vs. DAUGF (52.404). DAUGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.37M vs. CTXDF (-5.34M). CTXDF has more cash in the bank: 547K vs. DAUGF (358K). CTXDF (0) and DAUGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CTXDFDAUGFCTXDF / DAUGF
Capitalization16.1M12.8M126%
EBITDA-5.34M-2.37M225%
Gain YTD62.11652.404119%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash547K358K153%
Total Debt192KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXDF vs DAUGF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXDF
DAUGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8089
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DAUGF's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXDF (95). This means that DAUGF’s stock grew similarly to CTXDF’s over the last 12 months.

DAUGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXDF (100). This means that DAUGF’s stock grew similarly to CTXDF’s over the last 12 months.

DAUGF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXDF (100). This means that DAUGF’s stock grew similarly to CTXDF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXDF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (57). This means that CTXDF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXDF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that CTXDF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXDFDAUGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LFCR7.940.23
+2.98%
Lifecore Biomedical
RADX5.600.10
+1.82%
Radiopharm Theranostics Limited
HRB51.370.79
+1.56%
H&R Block
SAP271.991.05
+0.39%
SAP SE
SNDX16.190.06
+0.37%
Syndax Pharmaceuticals

CTXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXDF and LBSR have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXDF and LBSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXDF
1D Price
Change %
CTXDF100%
N/A
LBSR - CTXDF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.92%
EDDYF - CTXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - CTXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
DMXCF - CTXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
DAUGF - CTXDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAUGF and LRAXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAUGF and LRAXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAUGF
1D Price
Change %
DAUGF100%
N/A
LRAXF - DAUGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-14.86%
JZRIF - DAUGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - DAUGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTCDF - DAUGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - DAUGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
More