CTXXF
Price
$0.24
Change
+$0.01 (+4.35%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
33.54M
GCWOF
Price
$8.76
Change
-$0.39 (-4.26%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXXF vs GCWOF

Header iconCTXXF vs GCWOF Comparison
Open Charts CTXXF vs GCWOFBanner chart's image
Cematrix
Price$0.24
Change+$0.01 (+4.35%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization33.54M
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$8.76
Change-$0.39 (-4.26%)
Volume$2.96K
Capitalization3.19B
CTXXF vs GCWOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXXF vs. GCWOF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXXF is a Hold and GCWOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXXF: $0.24 vs. GCWOF: $8.76)
Brand notoriety: CTXXF and GCWOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXXF: 4% vs. GCWOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTXXF: $33.54M vs. GCWOF: $3.19B
CTXXF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $33.54M. GCWOF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCWOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTXXF is a better buy in the long-term than GCWOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCWOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GCWOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the short-term than CTXXF.

Price Growth

CTXXF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +5.31% price change this week, while GCWOF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCWOF($3.19B) has a higher market cap than CTXXF($33.5M). CTXXF YTD gains are higher at: 31.637 vs. GCWOF (0.114). GCWOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 288M vs. CTXXF (-1.87M). GCWOF has more cash in the bank: 770M vs. CTXXF (3.52M). CTXXF has less debt than GCWOF: CTXXF (4.11M) vs GCWOF (516M). GCWOF has higher revenues than CTXXF: GCWOF (1.25B) vs CTXXF (33.2M).
CTXXFGCWOFCTXXF / GCWOF
Capitalization33.5M3.19B1%
EBITDA-1.87M288M-1%
Gain YTD31.6370.11427,682%
P/E RatioN/A12.33-
Revenue33.2M1.25B3%
Total Cash3.52M770M0%
Total Debt4.11M516M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXXF vs GCWOF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXXF
GCWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
9051
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
269
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCWOF's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (89). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXXF (100). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXXF (90). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (61). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCWOF (69). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew significantly faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXXFGCWOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMTK0.02N/A
+18.94%
Omnitek Engineering Corp.
RLFTY3.010.03
+1.01%
RELIEF THERAPEUTICS HLDG AG
ESAIY7.090.02
+0.28%
Eisai Co., Ltd.
AAVXF7.28N/A
N/A
Abivax SA
PCCWY7.00N/A
N/A
PCCW Limited

CTXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXXF and CMTOY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXXF and CMTOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXXF
1D Price
Change %
CTXXF100%
+3.48%
CMTOY - CTXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
GCWOF - CTXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - CTXXF
3%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
IBJHF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
More

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
N/A
CX - GCWOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
CTXXF - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
CMTOY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
HLBZF - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
More