CTXXF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
33.54M
GCWOF
Price
$9.15
Change
+$0.09 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jan 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.19B
Ad is loading...

CTXXF vs GCWOF

Header iconCTXXF vs GCWOF Comparison
Open Charts CTXXF vs GCWOFBanner chart's image
Cematrix
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$229.4K
Capitalization33.54M
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$9.15
Change+$0.09 (+0.99%)
Volume$110
Capitalization3.19B
CTXXF vs GCWOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXXF vs. GCWOF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXXF is a Hold and GCWOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXXF: $0.17 vs. GCWOF: $9.15)
Brand notoriety: CTXXF and GCWOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXXF: 377% vs. GCWOF: 1%
Market capitalization -- CTXXF: $33.54M vs. GCWOF: $3.19B
CTXXF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $33.54M. GCWOF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGCWOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCWOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GCWOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the short-term than CTXXF.

Price Growth

CTXXF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while GCWOF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.68% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCWOF($3.19B) has a higher market cap than CTXXF($33.5M). GCWOF YTD gains are higher at: 4.571 vs. CTXXF (-5.420). GCWOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 288M vs. CTXXF (-1.87M). GCWOF has more cash in the bank: 770M vs. CTXXF (3.52M). CTXXF has less debt than GCWOF: CTXXF (4.11M) vs GCWOF (516M). GCWOF has higher revenues than CTXXF: GCWOF (1.25B) vs CTXXF (33.2M).
CTXXFGCWOFCTXXF / GCWOF
Capitalization33.5M3.19B1%
EBITDA-1.87M288M-1%
Gain YTD-5.4204.571-119%
P/E RatioN/A12.33-
Revenue33.2M1.25B3%
Total Cash3.52M770M0%
Total Debt4.11M516M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXXF vs GCWOF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXXF
GCWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10037
SMR RATING
1..100
8335
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9491
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GCWOF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (77). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXXF (100). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXXF (83). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (63). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (94). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXXFGCWOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEMCX8.380.06
+0.72%
Brandes Emerging Markets Value C
LIGNX10.770.06
+0.56%
Loomis Sayles International Growth N
GSMQX20.640.10
+0.49%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Svc
MSFRX19.170.06
+0.31%
MFS Total Return A
FHEAX16.450.03
+0.18%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate A

CTXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXXF and FCREY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXXF and FCREY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXXF
1D Price
Change %
CTXXF100%
-2.56%
FCREY - CTXXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTOY - CTXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - CTXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - CTXXF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
IBJHF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
N/A
CX - GCWOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
CTXXF - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
CMTOY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
More