CTXXF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
HLBZF
Price
$128.75
Change
-$3.60 (-2.72%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

CTXXF vs HLBZF

Header iconCTXXF vs HLBZF Comparison
Open Charts CTXXF vs HLBZFBanner chart's image
Cematrix
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.5K
CapitalizationN/A
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$128.75
Change-$3.60 (-2.72%)
Volume$4
CapitalizationN/A
CTXXF vs HLBZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXXF vs. HLBZF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXXF is a Hold and HLBZF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CTXXF: $0.17 vs. HLBZF: $128.75)
Brand notoriety: CTXXF and HLBZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXXF: 74% vs. HLBZF: 3%
Market capitalization -- CTXXF: $33.54M vs. HLBZF: $15.13B
CTXXF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $33.54M. HLBZF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHLBZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HLBZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLBZF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLBZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • HLBZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLBZF is a better buy in the short-term than CTXXF.

Price Growth

CTXXF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.56% price change this week, while HLBZF (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-4.12% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLBZF($15.1B) has a higher market cap than CTXXF($33.5M). HLBZF YTD gains are higher at: 61.139 vs. CTXXF (-12.935). HLBZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.77B vs. CTXXF (-1.87M). HLBZF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. CTXXF (3.52M). CTXXF has less debt than HLBZF: CTXXF (4.11M) vs HLBZF (8.71B). HLBZF has higher revenues than CTXXF: HLBZF (21.1B) vs CTXXF (33.2M).
CTXXFHLBZFCTXXF / HLBZF
Capitalization33.5M15.1B0%
EBITDA-1.87M3.77B-0%
Gain YTD-12.93561.139-21%
P/E RatioN/A8.46-
Revenue33.2M21.1B0%
Total Cash3.52M1.75B0%
Total Debt4.11M8.71B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXXF vs HLBZF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXXF
HLBZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7099
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10038
SMR RATING
1..100
8295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6438
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9425
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLBZF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXXF (77). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXXF (100). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as HLBZF (95). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (64). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTXXF (94). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXXFHLBZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLBZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TFESX12.32-0.07
-0.56%
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Service
FIKIX46.97-0.32
-0.68%
Fidelity Advisor Utilities Z
PLVIX21.02-0.16
-0.76%
Principal Large Cap Value III Inst
RFNGX90.25-0.76
-0.84%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R6
HIMVX27.86-0.28
-1.00%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Investor

CTXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXXF and FCREY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXXF and FCREY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXXF
1D Price
Change %
CTXXF100%
-1.96%
FCREY - CTXXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTOY - CTXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - CTXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - CTXXF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLBZF and BRKWF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLBZF and BRKWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLBZF
1D Price
Change %
HLBZF100%
N/A
BRKWF - HLBZF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDELY - HLBZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
VMC - HLBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
BCC - HLBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
CRH - HLBZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More