CTXXF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
IBJHF
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.25 (-14.71%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Ad is loading...

CTXXF vs IBJHF

Header iconCTXXF vs IBJHF Comparison
Open Charts CTXXF vs IBJHFBanner chart's image
Cematrix
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Ibstock
Price$1.45
Change-$0.25 (-14.71%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
CTXXF vs IBJHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXXF vs. IBJHF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXXF is a Hold and IBJHF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CTXXF: $0.17 vs. IBJHF: $1.45)
Brand notoriety: CTXXF and IBJHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXXF: 74% vs. IBJHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTXXF: $33.54M vs. IBJHF: $757.87M
CTXXF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $33.54M. IBJHF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $757.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIBJHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IBJHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBJHF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CTXXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

CTXXF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -5.56% price change this week, while IBJHF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-4.12% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBJHF($758M) has a higher market cap than CTXXF($33.5M). CTXXF YTD gains are higher at: -12.935 vs. IBJHF (-14.796). IBJHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 148M vs. CTXXF (-1.87M). IBJHF has more cash in the bank: 54.3M vs. CTXXF (3.52M). CTXXF has less debt than IBJHF: CTXXF (4.11M) vs IBJHF (133M). IBJHF has higher revenues than CTXXF: IBJHF (513M) vs CTXXF (33.2M).
CTXXFIBJHFCTXXF / IBJHF
Capitalization33.5M758M4%
EBITDA-1.87M148M-1%
Gain YTD-12.935-14.79687%
P/E RatioN/A7.75-
Revenue33.2M513M6%
Total Cash3.52M54.3M6%
Total Debt4.11M133M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXXF vs IBJHF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXXF
IBJHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7036
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6471
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
945
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBJHF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTXXF (77). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (100). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (88). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (71). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTXXF (94). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXXFIBJHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCOR47.060.04
+0.09%
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
QTAP37.80-0.06
-0.16%
Innovator Growth-100 Acltd Ps ETF™ April
INKM32.16-0.07
-0.22%
SPDR® SSgA Income Allocation ETF
SPEM39.86-0.09
-0.23%
SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
BAR26.08-0.09
-0.34%
GraniteShares Gold Trust

CTXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXXF and FCREY have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXXF and FCREY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXXF
1D Price
Change %
CTXXF100%
-1.96%
FCREY - CTXXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTOY - CTXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - CTXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - CTXXF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IBJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBJHF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBJHF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBJHF
1D Price
Change %
IBJHF100%
N/A
SMID - IBJHF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
CTXXF - IBJHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
HCMLF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
LKSGF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More