CTYP
Price
$6.25
Change
-$0.25 (-3.85%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
14.11M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
DNSKF
Price
$45.41
Change
+$3.73 (+8.95%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
34.64B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTYP vs DNSKF

Header iconCTYP vs DNSKF Comparison
Open Charts CTYP vs DNSKFBanner chart's image
Community Bankers (PA)
Price$6.25
Change-$0.25 (-3.85%)
Volume$175
Capitalization14.11M
Danske Bank A/S
Price$45.41
Change+$3.73 (+8.95%)
Volume$250
Capitalization34.64B
CTYP vs DNSKF Comparison Chart in %
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTYP vs. DNSKF commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTYP is a Hold and DNSKF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CTYP: $6.25 vs. DNSKF: $45.41)
Brand notoriety: CTYP and DNSKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTYP: 16% vs. DNSKF: 113%
Market capitalization -- CTYP: $14.11M vs. DNSKF: $34.64B
CTYP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.11M. DNSKF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $34.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTYP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDNSKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTYP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DNSKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CTYP and DNSKF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTYP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNSKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTYP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • DNSKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNSKF is a better buy in the short-term than CTYP.

Price Growth

CTYP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.85% price change this week, while DNSKF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +7.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+7.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSKF($34.6B) has a higher market cap than CTYP($14.1M). DNSKF has higher P/E ratio than CTYP: DNSKF (10.47) vs CTYP (8.56). DNSKF YTD gains are higher at: 53.102 vs. CTYP (18.316). CTYP has less debt than DNSKF: CTYP (21.1M) vs DNSKF (1.12T). DNSKF has higher revenues than CTYP: DNSKF (56.3B) vs CTYP (12.2M).
CTYPDNSKFCTYP / DNSKF
Capitalization14.1M34.6B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.31653.10234%
P/E Ratio8.5610.4782%
Revenue12.2M56.3B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.1M1.12T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTYP vs DNSKF: Fundamental Ratings
CTYP
DNSKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1004
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4741
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTYP's Valuation (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DNSKF (95). This means that CTYP’s stock grew significantly faster than DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTYP (100). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (100). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (47). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DNSKF (15). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTYPDNSKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
22%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HXL72.791.84
+2.59%
Hexcel Corp
NESR12.420.31
+2.56%
National Energy Services Reunited Corp
UONEK0.62N/A
N/A
Urban One
NRC11.66N/A
N/A
National Research Corp
CMCSA29.28-0.02
-0.07%
Comcast Corp

CTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTYP and MCHT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTYP and MCHT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTYP
1D Price
Change %
CTYP100%
N/A
MCHT - CTYP
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.57%
COSO - CTYP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
DNSKF - CTYP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - CTYP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSGB - CTYP
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DNSKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNSKF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNSKF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNSKF
1D Price
Change %
DNSKF100%
N/A
FSDK - DNSKF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - DNSKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
BPIRY - DNSKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
NWPP - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More