CTYP
Price
$6.15
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.89M
DNSKF
Price
$45.41
Change
+$3.73 (+8.95%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
34.73B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTYP vs DNSKF

Header iconCTYP vs DNSKF Comparison
Open Charts CTYP vs DNSKFBanner chart's image
Community Bankers (PA)
Price$6.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization13.89M
Danske Bank A/S
Price$45.41
Change+$3.73 (+8.95%)
Volume$250
Capitalization34.73B
CTYP vs DNSKF Comparison Chart in %
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTYP vs. DNSKF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTYP is a Hold and DNSKF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CTYP: $6.15 vs. DNSKF: $45.41)
Brand notoriety: CTYP and DNSKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTYP: 20% vs. DNSKF: 130%
Market capitalization -- CTYP: $13.89M vs. DNSKF: $34.73B
CTYP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $13.89M. DNSKF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $34.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTYP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDNSKF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CTYP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DNSKF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DNSKF is a better buy in the long-term than CTYP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTYP’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNSKF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTYP’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • DNSKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DNSKF is a better buy in the short-term than CTYP.

Price Growth

CTYP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.38% price change this week, while DNSKF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSKF($34.7B) has a higher market cap than CTYP($13.9M). DNSKF has higher P/E ratio than CTYP: DNSKF (10.35) vs CTYP (8.42). DNSKF YTD gains are higher at: 53.102 vs. CTYP (16.423). CTYP has less debt than DNSKF: CTYP (21.1M) vs DNSKF (1.12T). DNSKF has higher revenues than CTYP: DNSKF (56.3B) vs CTYP (12.2M).
CTYPDNSKFCTYP / DNSKF
Capitalization13.9M34.7B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.42353.10231%
P/E Ratio8.4210.3581%
Revenue12.2M56.3B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.1M1.12T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTYP vs DNSKF: Fundamental Ratings
CTYP
DNSKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
682
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
816
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTYP's Valuation (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DNSKF (95). This means that CTYP’s stock grew significantly faster than DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTYP (100). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTYP (68). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CTYP (50). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to CTYP’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DNSKF (16). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTYPDNSKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRT15.680.13
+0.84%
BRT Apartments Corp
BHP55.47-0.03
-0.05%
BHP Group Limited
VMEO7.77-0.01
-0.13%
Vimeo
SIDU1.10-0.01
-0.90%
Sidus Space
TTMI59.18-1.10
-1.82%
TTM Technologies

CTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTYP and MCHT have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTYP and MCHT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTYP
1D Price
Change %
CTYP100%
N/A
MCHT - CTYP
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COSO - CTYP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
DNSKF - CTYP
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NACB - CTYP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSGB - CTYP
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

DNSKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNSKF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNSKF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNSKF
1D Price
Change %
DNSKF100%
N/A
FSDK - DNSKF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - DNSKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
BPIRY - DNSKF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
NWPP - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More