CUB
Price
$10.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5, 12:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
322M
GRAF
Price
$10.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
301.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUB vs GRAF

Header iconCUB vs GRAF Comparison
Open Charts CUB vs GRAFBanner chart's image
Lionheart Holdings
Price$10.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$479
Capitalization322M
Graf Global
Price$10.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$183
Capitalization301.59M
CUB vs GRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUB vs. GRAF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUB is a Hold and GRAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CUB: $10.50 vs. GRAF: $10.49)
Brand notoriety: CUB and GRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUB: 0% vs. GRAF: 2%
Market capitalization -- CUB: $322M vs. GRAF: $301.59M
CUB [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $322M. GRAF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $301.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $172.82M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUB is a better buy in the long-term than GRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • GRAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUB is a better buy in the short-term than GRAF.

Price Growth

CUB (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GRAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUB($322M) has a higher market cap than GRAF($302M). GRAF (3.964) and CUB (3.960) have similar YTD gains . CUB has more cash in the bank: 569K vs. GRAF (107K).
CUBGRAFCUB / GRAF
Capitalization322M302M107%
EBITDAN/A-880.41K-
Gain YTD3.9603.964100%
P/E RatioN/A22.80-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash569K107K532%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUB: Fundamental Ratings
CUB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUBGRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
49%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOVFF1.290.04
+3.20%
Cannara Biotech Inc.
MTSUY22.970.12
+0.53%
Mitsubishi Corp.
UDOCF0.17N/A
N/A
UNIDOC HEALTH CORP.
PSPSY33.24N/A
N/A
PSP Swiss Property
FXCXD1.95N/A
N/A
FIH Mobile Ltd