CUB
Price
$10.55
Change
+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
323.53M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
MBAV
Price
$10.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
379.68M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUB vs MBAV

Header iconCUB vs MBAV Comparison
Open Charts CUB vs MBAVBanner chart's image
Lionheart Holdings
Price$10.55
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
Volume$190
Capitalization323.53M
M3 Brigade Acquisition V
Price$10.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$359.64K
Capitalization379.68M
CUB vs MBAV Comparison Chart in %
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBAV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUB vs. MBAV commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUB is a Buy and MBAV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CUB: $10.55 vs. MBAV: $10.56)
Brand notoriety: CUB and MBAV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUB: 2% vs. MBAV: 220%
Market capitalization -- CUB: $323.53M vs. MBAV: $379.68M
CUB [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $323.53M. MBAV’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $379.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $182.99M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBAV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBAV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CUB and MBAV are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBAV’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBAV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUB is a better buy in the short-term than MBAV.

Price Growth

CUB (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.09% price change this week, while MBAV (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +6.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+6.85% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBAV($380M) has a higher market cap than CUB($324M). MBAV YTD gains are higher at: 5.020 vs. CUB (4.455). MBAV has more cash in the bank: 800K vs. CUB (569K).
CUBMBAVCUB / MBAV
Capitalization324M380M85%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.4555.02089%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash569K800K71%
Total DebtN/A500K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUB: Fundamental Ratings
CUB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
34

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUBMBAV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
8%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBAV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSWV16.200.07
+0.45%
Main Street Financial Services Corp.
AITUF11.94N/A
N/A
Anritsu Corp.
THNPF40.93N/A
N/A
Technip Energies NV
CHGCY23.48-0.08
-0.34%
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
TCNB6.02-0.03
-0.54%
Town Center Bank (IL)

CUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUB and MBAV have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUB and MBAV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUB
1D Price
Change %
CUB100%
+0.19%
MBAV - CUB
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCIX - CUB
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
GRAF - CUB
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
KTH - CUB
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
MLACU - CUB
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MBAV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBAV has been loosely correlated with SBXD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBAV jumps, then SBXD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBAV
1D Price
Change %
MBAV100%
N/A
SBXD - MBAV
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
CUB - MBAV
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
BAYA - MBAV
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
IROHU - MBAV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EQV - MBAV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More