CUB
Price
$10.51
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
322.31M
MBAV
Price
$10.56
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
379.5M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUB vs MBAV

Header iconCUB vs MBAV Comparison
Open Charts CUB vs MBAVBanner chart's image
Lionheart Holdings
Price$10.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$350
Capitalization322.31M
M3 Brigade Acquisition V
Price$10.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$735.32K
Capitalization379.5M
CUB vs MBAV Comparison Chart in %
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBAV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUB vs. MBAV commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUB is a Buy and MBAV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CUB: $10.51 vs. MBAV: $10.56)
Brand notoriety: CUB and MBAV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUB: 1% vs. MBAV: 473%
Market capitalization -- CUB: $322.74M vs. MBAV: $379.14M
CUB [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $322.74M. MBAV’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $379.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.79M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBAV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBAV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUB is a better buy in the long-term than MBAV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBAV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MBAV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBAV is a better buy in the short-term than CUB.

Price Growth

CUB (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while MBAV (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +76.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.31% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBAV($380M) has a higher market cap than CUB($322M). MBAV YTD gains are higher at: 4.970 vs. CUB (4.059). MBAV has more cash in the bank: 800K vs. CUB (569K).
CUBMBAVCUB / MBAV
Capitalization322M380M85%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.0594.97082%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash569K800K71%
Total DebtN/A500K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUB: Fundamental Ratings
CUB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUBMBAV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBAV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COSAF0.19N/A
+2.70%
COSA RES CORP.
RYDAF36.850.80
+2.22%
SHELL PLC
HMENF1.600.02
+1.52%
Hemisphere Energy Corp.
JELLF32.47N/A
N/A
Jeol Ltd.
PNAGF4.50N/A
N/A
Petronas Gas Berhad

CUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUB and MBAV have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUB and MBAV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUB
1D Price
Change %
CUB100%
-0.13%
MBAV - CUB
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
CCIX - CUB
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - CUB
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KTH - CUB
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
HYAC - CUB
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More

MBAV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBAV and BAYA have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBAV and BAYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBAV
1D Price
Change %
MBAV100%
+0.09%
BAYA - MBAV
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUB - MBAV
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
IROHU - MBAV
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EQV - MBAV
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVNNU - MBAV
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More