Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUBCX vs PMZNX
CUBCX vs PMZNX Comparison
Open Charts CUBCX vs PMZNX
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.84
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets651.64M
PIMCO Mortgage Opportunities and Bd I-3
Price$9.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.07B
CUBCX vs PMZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUBCX vs. PMZNX commentary
Aug 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUBCX is a Hold and PMZNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMZNX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. CUBCX (652M). PMZNX pays higher dividends than CUBCX: PMZNX (6.69) vs CUBCX (4.17). CUBCX was incepted earlier than PMZNX: CUBCX (11 years) vs PMZNX (7 years). PMZNX (2.34) is less costly to investors than CUBCX (1.69). PMZNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1120.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). CUBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PMZNX: CUBCX (1000) vs PMZNX (1000000). CUBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.39 vs. PMZNX (5.03). CUBCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.98 vs. PMZNX (14.79).
| CUBCX | PMZNX | CUBCX / PMZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 2.29 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.34 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.786 | 3.953 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 652M | 12.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.17 | 6.69 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | 5.03 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.40 | 14.32 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.98 | 14.79 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement