Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUBCX vs PONPX
CUBCX vs PONPX Comparison
Open Charts CUBCX vs PONPX
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$15.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.2M
CUBCX vs PONPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUBCX vs. PONPX commentary
Sep 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUBCX is a Hold and PONPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONPX has more cash in the bank: 198B vs. CUBCX (693M). PONPX pays higher dividends than CUBCX: PONPX (5.98) vs CUBCX (4.07). CUBCX was incepted earlier than PONPX: CUBCX (11 years) vs PONPX (17 years). CUBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than PONPX (0.64). PONPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). CUBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PONPX: CUBCX (1000) vs PONPX (1000000). PONPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. CUBCX (5.06). PONPX return over 5 years is better than : 22.25 vs. CUBCX (19.32).
| CUBCX | PONPX | CUBCX / PONPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.64 | 258% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.64 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.834 | 7.901 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 198B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.07 | 5.98 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.06 | 6.97 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.02 | 25.41 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.32 | 22.25 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.26 | 59.32 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers