Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUBRX vs PONAX
CUBRX vs PONAX Comparison
Open Charts CUBRX vs PONAX
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class R6
Price$14.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.2M
CUBRX vs PONAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUBRX vs. PONAX commentary
Sep 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUBRX is a Hold and PONAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONAX has more cash in the bank: 198B vs. CUBRX (693M). PONAX pays higher dividends than CUBRX: PONAX (5.69) vs CUBRX (5.14). CUBRX was incepted earlier than PONAX: CUBRX (6 years) vs PONAX (18 years). PONAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CUBRX (0.61). PONAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. CUBRX (450.00). PONAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CUBRX: PONAX (1000) vs CUBRX (5000000). PONAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. CUBRX (6.28). CUBRX return over 5 years is better than : 26.10 vs. PONAX (20.42).
| CUBRX | PONAX | CUBRX / PONAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.94 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.616 | 7.685 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 693M | 198B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.14 | 5.69 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.28 | 6.65 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.01 | 24.28 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.10 | 20.42 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 54.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement