Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUBRX vs PONPX
CUBRX vs PONPX Comparison
Open Charts CUBRX vs PONPX
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund Class R6
Price$14.92
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets768.27M
CUBRX vs PONPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUBRX vs. PONPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUBRX is a Hold and PONPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONPX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. CUBRX (768M). PONPX pays higher dividends than CUBRX: PONPX (5.92) vs CUBRX (5.07). CUBRX was incepted earlier than PONPX: CUBRX (7 years) vs PONPX (18 years). PONPX (0.64) and CUBRX (0.61) have similar cost to investors . PONPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 711.00 vs. CUBRX (450.00). PONPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CUBRX: PONPX (1000000) vs CUBRX (5000000). PONPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.08 vs. CUBRX (7.36). CUBRX return over 5 years is better than : 22.93 vs. PONPX (21.56).
| CUBRX | PONPX | CUBRX / PONPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.64 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.64 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.628 | 9.477 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 768M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.07 | 5.92 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.36 | 10.08 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.30 | 27.96 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.93 | 21.56 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 59.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement