CUCSF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
HKBNF
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 29 closing price
Capitalization
492.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUCSF vs HKBNF

Header iconCUCSF vs HKBNF Comparison
Open Charts CUCSF vs HKBNFBanner chart's image
China Communications Services
Price$0.55
Change-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization3.29B
HKBN
Price$0.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization492.34M
CUCSF vs HKBNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUCSF vs. HKBNF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUCSF is a Hold and HKBNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CUCSF: $0.55 vs. HKBNF: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: CUCSF and HKBNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUCSF: 153% vs. HKBNF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CUCSF: $3.29B vs. HKBNF: $492.34M
CUCSF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.29B. HKBNF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $492.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUCSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHKBNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HKBNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUCSF is a better buy in the long-term than HKBNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUCSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUCSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CUCSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HKBNF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUCSF($3.29B) has a higher market cap than HKBNF($492M). HKBNF has higher P/E ratio than CUCSF: HKBNF (23.42) vs CUCSF (7.86). CUCSF YTD gains are higher at: 28.019 vs. HKBNF (0.000). CUCSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.79B vs. HKBNF (2.19B). CUCSF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. HKBNF (1.01B). CUCSF has less debt than HKBNF: CUCSF (2.53B) vs HKBNF (11.6B). CUCSF has higher revenues than HKBNF: CUCSF (139B) vs HKBNF (11.5B).
CUCSFHKBNFCUCSF / HKBNF
Capitalization3.29B492M668%
EBITDA3.79B2.19B173%
Gain YTD28.0190.000-
P/E Ratio7.8623.4234%
Revenue139B11.5B1,209%
Total Cash19.5B1.01B1,936%
Total Debt2.53B11.6B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUCSFHKBNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
2%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
2%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
3%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRINX22.680.22
+0.98%
Victory Diversified Stock R
RNGAX57.810.52
+0.91%
American Funds New Economy R1
PSCZX24.570.20
+0.82%
PGIM Jennison Small Company Z
CSGTX4.110.03
+0.74%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth C
FLMFX9.600.06
+0.63%
Meeder Muirfield Retail

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRKNY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HKBNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HKBNF and KORE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HKBNF and KORE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HKBNF
1D Price
Change %
HKBNF100%
N/A
KORE - HKBNF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AAFRF - HKBNF
9%
Poorly correlated
+17.95%
HTWSF - HKBNF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHS - HKBNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
CUCSF - HKBNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More