CUCSF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
HTWSF
Price
$1.63
Change
-$0.07 (-4.12%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUCSF vs HTWSF

Header iconCUCSF vs HTWSF Comparison
Open Charts CUCSF vs HTWSFBanner chart's image
China Communications Services
Price$0.55
Change-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization3.29B
Helios Towers
Price$1.63
Change-$0.07 (-4.12%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.22B
CUCSF vs HTWSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUCSF vs. HTWSF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUCSF is a Hold and HTWSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CUCSF: $0.55 vs. HTWSF: $1.63)
Brand notoriety: CUCSF and HTWSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUCSF: 153% vs. HTWSF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CUCSF: $3.29B vs. HTWSF: $1.22B
CUCSF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.29B. HTWSF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUCSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHTWSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUCSF is a better buy in the long-term than HTWSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUCSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTWSF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUCSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HTWSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUCSF is a better buy in the short-term than HTWSF.

Price Growth

CUCSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HTWSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +1.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUCSF($3.29B) has a higher market cap than HTWSF($1.22B). HTWSF YTD gains are higher at: 52.336 vs. CUCSF (28.019). CUCSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.79B vs. HTWSF (113M). CUCSF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. HTWSF (389M). HTWSF has less debt than CUCSF: HTWSF (1.47B) vs CUCSF (2.53B). CUCSF has higher revenues than HTWSF: CUCSF (139B) vs HTWSF (502M).
CUCSFHTWSFCUCSF / HTWSF
Capitalization3.29B1.22B269%
EBITDA3.79B113M3,350%
Gain YTD28.01952.33654%
P/E Ratio7.86N/A-
Revenue139B502M27,689%
Total Cash19.5B389M5,013%
Total Debt2.53B1.47B172%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUCSFHTWSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HTWSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRINX22.680.22
+0.98%
Victory Diversified Stock R
RNGAX57.810.52
+0.91%
American Funds New Economy R1
PSCZX24.570.20
+0.82%
PGIM Jennison Small Company Z
CSGTX4.110.03
+0.74%
Transamerica Small Cap Growth C
FLMFX9.600.06
+0.63%
Meeder Muirfield Retail

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRKNY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and LBTYA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and LBTYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
N/A
LBTYA - HTWSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
SFTBY - HTWSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
LBTYK - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKM - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
VDMCY - HTWSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.23%
More