CUCSF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.29B
PTTWF
Price
$2.05
Change
+$0.46 (+28.93%)
Updated
Aug 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUCSF vs PTTWF

Header iconCUCSF vs PTTWF Comparison
Open Charts CUCSF vs PTTWFBanner chart's image
China Communications Services
Price$0.55
Change-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Volume$6.6K
Capitalization3.29B
Orange Polska SA
Price$2.05
Change+$0.46 (+28.93%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.42B
CUCSF vs PTTWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUCSF vs. PTTWF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUCSF is a Hold and PTTWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CUCSF: $0.55 vs. PTTWF: $2.05)
Brand notoriety: CUCSF and PTTWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUCSF: 153% vs. PTTWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CUCSF: $3.29B vs. PTTWF: $2.42B
CUCSF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.29B. PTTWF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUCSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePTTWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PTTWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CUCSF and PTTWF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUCSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUCSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CUCSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PTTWF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+1.68% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUCSF($3.29B) has a higher market cap than PTTWF($2.42B). PTTWF has higher P/E ratio than CUCSF: PTTWF (13.59) vs CUCSF (7.86). CUCSF YTD gains are higher at: 28.019 vs. PTTWF (0.000). PTTWF (3.95B) and CUCSF (3.79B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CUCSF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. PTTWF (724M). CUCSF has less debt than PTTWF: CUCSF (2.53B) vs PTTWF (7.12B). CUCSF has higher revenues than PTTWF: CUCSF (139B) vs PTTWF (12.9B).
CUCSFPTTWFCUCSF / PTTWF
Capitalization3.29B2.42B136%
EBITDA3.79B3.95B96%
Gain YTD28.0190.000-
P/E Ratio7.8613.5958%
Revenue139B12.9B1,078%
Total Cash19.5B724M2,693%
Total Debt2.53B7.12B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF vs PTTWF: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
PTTWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
7380
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PTTWF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (17). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

PTTWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (100). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as PTTWF (80). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew similarly to PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PTTWF (55). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew similarly to PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

PTTWF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUCSF (65). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUCSFPTTWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
3%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGVRX45.080.51
+1.14%
JPMorgan Growth Advantage R5
GABTX24.410.08
+0.33%
Gabelli Global Content & Connect AAA
IVORX19.330.06
+0.31%
Macquarie Mid Cap Income Opps R
GREZX9.380.01
+0.11%
GuideStone Funds Global Rl Est Secs Inv
KGGAX15.11-0.03
-0.20%
Kopernik Global All-Cap A

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRKNY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PTTWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTTWF and LICT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTTWF and LICT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTTWF
1D Price
Change %
PTTWF100%
N/A
LICT - PTTWF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TLSNF - PTTWF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IHS - PTTWF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
CUCSF - PTTWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LLEIF - PTTWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More