Ad is loading...
CUCSF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 1 closing price
TRKNY
Price
$2.64
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
Ad is loading...

CUCSF vs TRKNY

Header iconCUCSF vs TRKNY Comparison
Open Charts CUCSF vs TRKNYBanner chart's image
China Communications Services
Price$0.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.63K
CapitalizationN/A
Turk Telekomunikasyon
Price$2.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
CUCSF vs TRKNY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUCSF vs. TRKNY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUCSF is a Hold and TRKNY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CUCSF: $0.43 vs. TRKNY: $2.64)
Brand notoriety: CUCSF and TRKNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUCSF: 100% vs. TRKNY: 111%
Market capitalization -- CUCSF: $3.29B vs. TRKNY: $2.76B
CUCSF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.29B. TRKNY’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUCSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRKNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRKNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRKNY is a better buy in the long-term than CUCSF.

Price Growth

CUCSF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRKNY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +9.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+9.09% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUCSF($3.29B) has a higher market cap than TRKNY($2.76B). TRKNY has higher P/E ratio than CUCSF: TRKNY (12.32) vs CUCSF (7.86). TRKNY YTD gains are higher at: 50.857 vs. CUCSF (0.000). TRKNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14B vs. CUCSF (3.79B). CUCSF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. TRKNY (14B). CUCSF has less debt than TRKNY: CUCSF (2.53B) vs TRKNY (50.2B). CUCSF has higher revenues than TRKNY: CUCSF (139B) vs TRKNY (53.8B).
CUCSFTRKNYCUCSF / TRKNY
Capitalization3.29B2.76B119%
EBITDA3.79B14B27%
Gain YTD0.00050.857-
P/E Ratio7.8612.3264%
Revenue139B53.8B258%
Total Cash19.5B14B139%
Total Debt2.53B50.2B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF vs TRKNY: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
TRKNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
7240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8195
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRKNY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (14). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRKNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUCSF (100). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRKNY's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (72). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRKNY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (71). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as TRKNY (95). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew similarly to TRKNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVFCX3.70N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Intl Strat Val Div C
VTSIX98.12-0.90
-0.91%
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small Cap I
FESCX10.89-0.12
-1.09%
First Eagle Small Cap Opportunity I
WCFOX9.82-0.15
-1.50%
WCM Focused International Opps Inv
BHCFX19.69-0.58
-2.86%
Baron Health Care Retail

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
-6.48%
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRKNY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRKNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRKNY and TRAGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRKNY and TRAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRKNY
1D Price
Change %
TRKNY100%
N/A
TRAGF - TRKNY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKTTF - TRKNY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIMB - TRKNY
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
TLTZY - TRKNY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUCSF - TRKNY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More