CUCSF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.02 (-3.51%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
4.04B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TRKNY
Price
$2.29
Change
-$0.23 (-9.13%)
Updated
Oct 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.02B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUCSF vs TRKNY

Header iconCUCSF vs TRKNY Comparison
Open Charts CUCSF vs TRKNYBanner chart's image
China Communications Services
Price$0.55
Change-$0.02 (-3.51%)
Volume$900
Capitalization4.04B
Turk Telekomunikasyon
Price$2.29
Change-$0.23 (-9.13%)
Volume$2.28K
Capitalization4.02B
CUCSF vs TRKNY Comparison Chart in %
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRKNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUCSF vs. TRKNY commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUCSF is a Hold and TRKNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CUCSF: $0.55 vs. TRKNY: $2.29)
Brand notoriety: CUCSF and TRKNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUCSF: 56% vs. TRKNY: 176%
Market capitalization -- CUCSF: $4.04B vs. TRKNY: $4.02B
CUCSF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $4.04B. TRKNY’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $4.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $258.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRKNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRKNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUCSF is a better buy in the long-term than TRKNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUCSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRKNY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUCSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TRKNY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRKNY is a better buy in the short-term than CUCSF.

Price Growth

CUCSF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRKNY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -9.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUCSF($4.04B) and TRKNY($4.02B) have the same market capitalization . TRKNY has higher P/E ratio than CUCSF: TRKNY (12.07) vs CUCSF (7.46). CUCSF YTD gains are higher at: 26.215 vs. TRKNY (-6.816). TRKNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 89.4B vs. CUCSF (4.24B). CUCSF has more cash in the bank: 14.2B vs. TRKNY (9.59B). CUCSF has less debt than TRKNY: CUCSF (2.03B) vs TRKNY (65.9B). TRKNY has higher revenues than CUCSF: TRKNY (210B) vs CUCSF (153B).
CUCSFTRKNYCUCSF / TRKNY
Capitalization4.04B4.02B100%
EBITDA4.24B89.4B5%
Gain YTD26.215-6.816-385%
P/E Ratio7.4612.0762%
Revenue153B210B73%
Total Cash14.2B9.59B148%
Total Debt2.03B65.9B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF vs TRKNY: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
TRKNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9925
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
1974
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5384
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5812
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRKNY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (21). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRKNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (100). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRKNY (74). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRKNY’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as TRKNY (84). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew similarly to TRKNY’s over the last 12 months.

TRKNY's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUCSF (58). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUCSFTRKNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRKNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIASX18.75N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Company HLS IA
MLPZX6.16N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Y
GINDX31.99N/A
N/A
Gotham Index Plus Institutional
RSLCX69.61N/A
N/A
American Funds SMALLCAP World R3
COMAX29.08N/A
N/A
DWS Digital Horizons A

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRKNY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRKNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRKNY and TRAGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRKNY and TRAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRKNY
1D Price
Change %
TRKNY100%
N/A
TRAGF - TRKNY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKTTF - TRKNY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIMB - TRKNY
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.10%
TLTZY - TRKNY
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
CUCSF - TRKNY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More