CUKPF
Price
$25.30
Change
-$0.74 (-2.84%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
38.42B
FOCIF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
123.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUKPF vs FOCIF

Header iconCUKPF vs FOCIF Comparison
Open Charts CUKPF vs FOCIFBanner chart's image
Carnival
Price$25.30
Change-$0.74 (-2.84%)
Volume$120
Capitalization38.42B
Focusrite
Price$2.50
Change-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization123.65M
CUKPF vs FOCIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUKPF vs. FOCIF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUKPF is a Hold and FOCIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CUKPF: $25.30 vs. FOCIF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: CUKPF and FOCIF are both not notable
CUKPF represents the Consumer Sundries, while FOCIF is part of the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUKPF: 13% vs. FOCIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CUKPF: $38.42B vs. FOCIF: $123.65M
CUKPF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $38.42B. FOCIF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $123.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $183.18B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $39.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.34B. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUKPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFOCIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CUKPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FOCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUKPF is a better buy in the long-term than FOCIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUKPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUKPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

CUKPF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FOCIF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +3.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +29.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+3.78% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Recreational Products (+29.37% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUKPF($38.4B) has a higher market cap than FOCIF($124M). FOCIF has higher P/E ratio than CUKPF: FOCIF (55.37) vs CUKPF (13.25). CUKPF YTD gains are higher at: 11.265 vs. FOCIF (-31.880). CUKPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.75B vs. FOCIF (15.2M). CUKPF has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. FOCIF (15.6M). FOCIF has less debt than CUKPF: FOCIF (33.5M) vs CUKPF (28.6B). CUKPF has higher revenues than FOCIF: CUKPF (26B) vs FOCIF (163M).
CUKPFFOCIFCUKPF / FOCIF
Capitalization38.4B124M30,968%
EBITDA6.75B15.2M44,414%
Gain YTD11.265-31.880-35%
P/E Ratio13.2555.3724%
Revenue26B163M15,951%
Total Cash2.15B15.6M13,756%
Total Debt28.6B33.5M85,373%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUKPF vs FOCIF: Fundamental Ratings
CUKPF
FOCIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3837
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
3290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4279
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
834
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOCIF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUKPF (82). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

CUKPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (100). This means that CUKPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

CUKPF's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (90). This means that CUKPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

CUKPF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (79). This means that CUKPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CUKPF (83). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUKPFFOCIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIHL17.200.34
+2.02%
Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited
ANL1.690.03
+1.81%
Adlai Nortye Ltd
BROS73.210.94
+1.30%
Dutch Bros
FULTP19.540.14
+0.74%
Fulton Financial Corp
MLAB68.79-0.55
-0.79%
Mesa Laboratories

CUKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUKPF and PLBY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUKPF and PLBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUKPF
1D Price
Change %
CUKPF100%
N/A
PLBY - CUKPF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
HAS - CUKPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
NWTG - CUKPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
PLNT - CUKPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
OSW - CUKPF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.46%
More

FOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCIF and GMWKF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCIF and GMWKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOCIF
1D Price
Change %
FOCIF100%
N/A
GMWKF - FOCIF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
GYYMF - FOCIF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - FOCIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More