CUKPF
Price
$26.04
Change
-$1.04 (-3.84%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
21.45B
GBBYF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
121.94M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUKPF vs GBBYF

Header iconCUKPF vs GBBYF Comparison
Open Charts CUKPF vs GBBYFBanner chart's image
Carnival
Price$26.04
Change-$1.04 (-3.84%)
Volume$200
Capitalization21.45B
Goodbaby International Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization121.94M
CUKPF vs GBBYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUKPF vs. GBBYF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUKPF is a StrongBuy and GBBYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (GBBYF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GBBYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • GBBYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUKPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBBYF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUKPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GBBYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBBYF is a better buy in the short-term than CUKPF.

Price Growth

GBBYF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.18%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.08% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUKPF($21.5B) has a higher market cap than GBBYF($122M). GBBYF has higher P/E ratio than CUKPF: GBBYF (102.04) vs CUKPF (1.90). GBBYF YTD gains are higher at: 69.492 vs. CUKPF (14.506). CUKPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 833M vs. GBBYF (703M). CUKPF has more cash in the bank: 4.47B vs. GBBYF (1.11B). GBBYF has less debt than CUKPF: GBBYF (3.82B) vs CUKPF (35.1B). CUKPF has higher revenues than GBBYF: CUKPF (17.5B) vs GBBYF (9.69B).
CUKPFGBBYFCUKPF / GBBYF
Capitalization21.5B122M17,623%
EBITDA833M703M118%
Gain YTD14.50669.49221%
P/E Ratio1.90102.042%
Revenue17.5B9.69B181%
Total Cash4.47B1.11B404%
Total Debt35.1B3.82B919%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUKPF vs GBBYF: Fundamental Ratings
CUKPF
GBBYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9824
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6073
SMR RATING
1..100
3288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9217
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3465

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBBYF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUKPF (65). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

CUKPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBYF (73). This means that CUKPF’s stock grew similarly to GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

CUKPF's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBBYF (88). This means that CUKPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CUKPF (41). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to CUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CUKPF (92). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew significantly faster than CUKPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUKPFGBBYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUKPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBBYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCOHF1.300.05
+4.00%
China State Construction International Holdings, Ltd.
HEWA0.11N/A
N/A
HealthWarehouse.com, Inc.
SNOTF0.51N/A
N/A
Sinotrans Ltd.
CMWAY115.71-0.70
-0.60%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
IVCTF0.03N/A
-5.56%
INVICTUS ENERGY LTD.

CUKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUKPF and PLBY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUKPF and PLBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUKPF
1D Price
Change %
CUKPF100%
N/A
PLBY - CUKPF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
VEEE - CUKPF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.09%
HAS - CUKPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
NWTG - CUKPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.74%
PLNT - CUKPF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
More

GBBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBBYF and THLPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBBYF and THLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBBYF
1D Price
Change %
GBBYF100%
N/A
THLPF - GBBYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOMYY - GBBYF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - GBBYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GYYMF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More