CUKPF
Price
$22.72
Change
-$0.33 (-1.43%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Capitalization
31.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLBY
Price
$1.61
Change
-$0.08 (-4.73%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
173.49M
112 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUKPF vs PLBY

Header iconCUKPF vs PLBY Comparison
Open Charts CUKPF vs PLBYBanner chart's image
Carnival
Price$22.72
Change-$0.33 (-1.43%)
Volume$753
Capitalization31.09B
Playboy
Price$1.61
Change-$0.08 (-4.73%)
Volume$8.13K
Capitalization173.49M
CUKPF vs PLBY Comparison Chart in %
CUKPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUKPF vs. PLBY commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUKPF is a Hold and PLBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CUKPF: $22.72 vs. PLBY: $1.61)
Brand notoriety: CUKPF and PLBY are both not notable
CUKPF represents the Consumer Sundries, while PLBY is part of the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUKPF: 6% vs. PLBY: 107%
Market capitalization -- CUKPF: $31.09B vs. PLBY: $173.49M
CUKPF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $31.09B. PLBY’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $173.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $151.2B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $32.05B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $15.88B. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUKPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUKPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUKPF is a better buy in the long-term than PLBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUKPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUKPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • PLBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUKPF is a better buy in the short-term than PLBY.

Price Growth

CUKPF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -1.41% price change this week, while PLBY (@Recreational Products) price change was +18.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.24%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLBY is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-0.11% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Recreational Products (-1.81% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUKPF($31.1B) has a higher market cap than PLBY($173M). PLBY YTD gains are higher at: 10.274 vs. CUKPF (-0.064). CUKPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.09B vs. PLBY (-35.29M). CUKPF has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. PLBY (19.6M). PLBY has less debt than CUKPF: PLBY (201M) vs CUKPF (27.9B). CUKPF has higher revenues than PLBY: CUKPF (26.2B) vs PLBY (120M).
CUKPFPLBYCUKPF / PLBY
Capitalization31.1B173M17,977%
EBITDA4.09B-35.29M-11,600%
Gain YTD-0.06410.274-1%
P/E Ratio11.71N/A-
Revenue26.2B120M21,833%
Total Cash1.76B19.6M8,995%
Total Debt27.9B201M13,881%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUKPF: Fundamental Ratings
CUKPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
37
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUKPFPLBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUKPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLBY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CREAM.X1.5284260.398379
+35.25%
Cream Finance cryptocurrency
USDP.X0.998727-0.000389
-0.04%
Pax Dollar cryptocurrency
SANTOS.X1.612389-0.002809
-0.17%
Santos FC Fan Token cryptocurrency
WBETH.X3274.731700-107.985350
-3.19%
Wrapped Beacon ETH cryptocurrency
GLM.X0.220757-0.008416
-3.67%
Golem cryptocurrency

CUKPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUKPF and PLBY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUKPF and PLBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUKPF
1D Price
Change %
CUKPF100%
N/A
PLBY - CUKPF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.73%
HAS - CUKPF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
NWTG - CUKPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
PLNT - CUKPF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
OSW - CUKPF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
More

PLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLBY and CUKPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLBY and CUKPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLBY
1D Price
Change %
PLBY100%
-4.73%
CUKPF - PLBY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAKK - PLBY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
CLAR - PLBY
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
MODG - PLBY
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.04%
PRKS - PLBY
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.58%
More