It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CUKPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLNT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CUKPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLNT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CUKPF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PLNT (@Recreational Products) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.35%.
PLNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
CUKPF | PLNT | CUKPF / PLNT | |
Capitalization | 21.5B | 5.58B | 385% |
EBITDA | 833M | 444M | 188% |
Gain YTD | 39.620 | 39.493 | 100% |
P/E Ratio | 1.90 | 39.55 | 5% |
Revenue | 17.5B | 1.07B | 1,634% |
Total Cash | 4.47B | 351M | 1,273% |
Total Debt | 35.1B | 2.37B | 1,484% |
CUKPF | PLNT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CUKPF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as PLNT (93) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CUKPF’s stock grew similarly to PLNT’s over the last 12 months.
PLNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUKPF (100) in the null industry. This means that PLNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUKPF’s over the last 12 months.
PLNT's SMR Rating (11) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUKPF (47) in the null industry. This means that PLNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUKPF’s over the last 12 months.
CUKPF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PLNT (41) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CUKPF’s stock grew similarly to PLNT’s over the last 12 months.
PLNT's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CUKPF (95) in the null industry. This means that PLNT’s stock grew significantly faster than CUKPF’s over the last 12 months.
CUKPF | PLNT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago59% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago87% | 10 days ago71% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUKPF and PLBY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUKPF and PLBY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUKPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CUKPF | 100% | N/A | ||
PLBY - CUKPF | 29% Poorly correlated | +3.87% | ||
VEEE - CUKPF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
HAS - CUKPF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
SPGC - CUKPF | 7% Poorly correlated | +9.09% | ||
PLNT - CUKPF | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.84% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLNT has been loosely correlated with PRKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLNT jumps, then PRKS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLNT | 100% | +2.84% | ||
PRKS - PLNT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
LTH - PLNT | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
PII - PLNT | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
MCFT - PLNT | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
GOLF - PLNT | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
More |