Advertisement
CURLF vs GLASF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CURLF is a Hold and GLASF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CURLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGLASF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CURLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GLASF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CURLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLASF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CURLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- GLASF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CURLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -5.31% price change this week, while GLASF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -6.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
CURLF is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.04% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| CURLF | GLASF | CURLF / GLASF | |
| Capitalization | 2.67B | 204M | 1,311% |
| EBITDA | 42.5M | -24.02M | -177% |
| Gain YTD | -46.463 | 5.172 | -898% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.38B | 106M | 1,299% |
| Total Cash | 116M | 13.4M | 866% |
| Total Debt | 894M | 73.6M | 1,215% |
CURLF | GLASF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CURLF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLASF (96). This means that CURLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
CURLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that CURLF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
CURLF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GLASF (100). This means that CURLF’s stock grew similarly to GLASF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CURLF (93). This means that GLASF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CURLF’s over the last 12 months.
GLASF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CURLF (100). This means that GLASF’s stock grew similarly to CURLF’s over the last 12 months.
| CURLF | GLASF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
CURLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CURLF has been closely correlated with GTBIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CURLF jumps, then GTBIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CURLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CURLF | 100% | -4.55% | ||
| GTBIF - CURLF | 82% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| TCNNF - CURLF | 80% Closely correlated | -4.10% | ||
| VRNOF - CURLF | 78% Closely correlated | -6.71% | ||
| CRLBF - CURLF | 76% Closely correlated | -5.57% | ||
| AYRWF - CURLF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.49% | ||
More | ||||
GLASF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLASF has been loosely correlated with TSNDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLASF jumps, then TSNDF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLASF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLASF | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| TSNDF - GLASF | 63% Loosely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| GTBIF - GLASF | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| TCNNF - GLASF | 60% Loosely correlated | -4.10% | ||
| VRNOF - GLASF | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.71% | ||
| CURLF - GLASF | 57% Loosely correlated | -4.55% | ||
More | ||||