CURLF
Price
$1.62
Change
+$0.14 (+9.46%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
71 days until earnings call
JUSHF
Price
$0.29
Change
+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
141 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CURLF vs JUSHF

Header iconCURLF vs JUSHF Comparison
Open Charts CURLF vs JUSHFBanner chart's image
Curaleaf
Price$1.62
Change+$0.14 (+9.46%)
Volume$856.48K
CapitalizationN/A
Jushi Holdings
Price$0.29
Change+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Volume$334.32K
CapitalizationN/A
CURLF vs JUSHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CURLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CURLF vs. JUSHF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CURLF is a Hold and JUSHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CURLF: $1.62 vs. JUSHF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: CURLF and JUSHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CURLF: 97% vs. JUSHF: 147%
Market capitalization -- CURLF: $2.67B vs. JUSHF: $94.38M
CURLF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $2.67B. JUSHF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $94.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CURLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJUSHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CURLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JUSHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CURLF and JUSHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CURLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JUSHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CURLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JUSHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JUSHF is a better buy in the short-term than CURLF.

Price Growth

CURLF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -8.22% price change this week, while JUSHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -6.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CURLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

JUSHF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.61% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CURLF($2.67B) has a higher market cap than JUSHF($94.4M). JUSHF YTD gains are higher at: -35.874 vs. CURLF (-60.099). CURLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.5M vs. JUSHF (-106.76M). CURLF has more cash in the bank: 116M vs. JUSHF (18.5M). JUSHF has less debt than CURLF: JUSHF (309M) vs CURLF (894M). CURLF has higher revenues than JUSHF: CURLF (1.38B) vs JUSHF (292M).
CURLFJUSHFCURLF / JUSHF
Capitalization2.67B94.4M2,833%
EBITDA42.5M-106.76M-40%
Gain YTD-60.099-35.874168%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.38B292M472%
Total Cash116M18.5M627%
Total Debt894M309M289%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CURLF vs JUSHF: Fundamental Ratings
CURLF
JUSHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7863
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9595
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CURLF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as JUSHF (55). This means that CURLF’s stock grew similarly to JUSHF’s over the last 12 months.

CURLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JUSHF (100). This means that CURLF’s stock grew similarly to JUSHF’s over the last 12 months.

CURLF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as JUSHF (100). This means that CURLF’s stock grew similarly to JUSHF’s over the last 12 months.

CURLF's Price Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as JUSHF (95). This means that CURLF’s stock grew similarly to JUSHF’s over the last 12 months.

CURLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as JUSHF (100). This means that CURLF’s stock grew similarly to JUSHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CURLFJUSHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CURLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JUSHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PHRRF0.16N/A
+0.62%
PharmaTher Holdings Ltd.
MTUAF342.252.00
+0.59%
MTU Aero Engines AG
HEINY36.55-0.19
-0.52%
Heineken N.V.
SMGZY22.39-0.27
-1.19%
Smiths Group Plc
IPOOF1.11-0.03
-2.25%
InPlay Oil Corp.

JUSHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JUSHF has been closely correlated with TCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JUSHF jumps, then TCNNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUSHF
1D Price
Change %
JUSHF100%
+6.74%
TCNNF - JUSHF
74%
Closely correlated
+7.34%
CRLBF - JUSHF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
CURLF - JUSHF
72%
Closely correlated
+9.46%
TSNDF - JUSHF
71%
Closely correlated
+24.34%
AYRWF - JUSHF
70%
Closely correlated
+17.72%
More