CURV
Price
$1.10
Change
-$0.02 (-1.79%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
111.07M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RTMNF
Price
$1.69
Change
+$0.23 (+15.75%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
72.44M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CURV vs RTMNF

Header iconCURV vs RTMNF Comparison
Open Charts CURV vs RTMNFBanner chart's image
Torrid Holdings
Price$1.10
Change-$0.02 (-1.79%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization111.07M
Reitmans (Canada)
Price$1.69
Change+$0.23 (+15.75%)
Volume$1.88K
Capitalization72.44M
CURV vs RTMNF Comparison Chart in %
CURV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RTMNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CURV vs. RTMNF commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CURV is a Hold and RTMNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CURV: $1.12 vs. RTMNF: $1.69)
Brand notoriety: CURV and RTMNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Apparel/Footwear Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CURV: 63% vs. RTMNF: 301%
Market capitalization -- CURV: $109.08M vs. RTMNF: $73.2M
CURV [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] is valued at $109.08M. RTMNF’s [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] market capitalization is $73.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry ranges from $170.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear Retail] industry is $16.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CURV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRTMNF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CURV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RTMNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RTMNF is a better buy in the long-term than CURV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CURV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RTMNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CURV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RTMNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CURV is a better buy in the short-term than RTMNF.

Price Growth

CURV (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а -1.75% price change this week, while RTMNF (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was -3.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CURV is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear Retail (-3.74% weekly)

Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CURV($111M) has a higher market cap than RTMNF($72.4M). RTMNF has higher P/E ratio than CURV: RTMNF (236.93) vs CURV (37.33). RTMNF YTD gains are higher at: -15.500 vs. CURV (-78.585). CURV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 113M vs. RTMNF (66.4M). RTMNF has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. CURV (21.5M). RTMNF has less debt than CURV: RTMNF (159M) vs CURV (436M). CURV has higher revenues than RTMNF: CURV (1.07B) vs RTMNF (767M).
CURVRTMNFCURV / RTMNF
Capitalization111M72.4M153%
EBITDA113M66.4M170%
Gain YTD-78.585-15.500507%
P/E Ratio37.33236.9316%
Revenue1.07B767M139%
Total Cash21.5M125M17%
Total Debt436M159M274%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RTMNF: Fundamental Ratings
RTMNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
64
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CURVRTMNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CURV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RTMNF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
YKLTF16.501.80
+12.28%
Yakult Honsha Co., Ltd.
GNMLF0.96N/A
N/A
Genomma Lab International SAB DE CV
NWPP3.15N/A
N/A
New Peoples Bankshares, Inc.
NRCD0.06N/A
N/A
Nashville Records, Inc.
KMTUF32.30-1.10
-3.29%
Komatsu Ltd.

CURV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CURV has been loosely correlated with DBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CURV jumps, then DBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CURV
1D Price
Change %
CURV100%
N/A
DBI - CURV
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.14%
LULU - CURV
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
SCVL - CURV
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
GCO - CURV
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
BKE - CURV
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
More

RTMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RTMNF and DBGI have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RTMNF and DBGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RTMNF
1D Price
Change %
RTMNF100%
N/A
DBGI - RTMNF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
RTMAF - RTMNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.44%
CURV - RTMNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NXGPF - RTMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZTAF - RTMNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More