Ad is loading...
CUSEX vs GFAFX
CUSEX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts CUSEX vs GFAFX
Capital Group US Equity
Price$32.37
Change+$2.65 (+8.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.94M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.18
Change+$6.48 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
CUSEX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUSEX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUSEX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. CUSEX (310M). CUSEX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: CUSEX (0.86) vs GFAFX (0.35). CUSEX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: CUSEX (14 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than CUSEX (0.43). CUSEX (26.00) and GFAFX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CUSEX: GFAFX (250) vs CUSEX (25000). CUSEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.78 vs. GFAFX (-12.13). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.47 vs. CUSEX (33.29).
| CUSEX | GFAFX | CUSEX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.67 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.67 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.922 | -16.350 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310M | 272B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.86 | 0.35 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.78 | -12.13 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.07 | -3.17 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.29 | 36.47 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.85 | 39.06 | 138% |