Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs DMAT
CUT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs DMAT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$27.91
Change+$0.56 (+2.05%)
Volume$2.91K
Net Assets35.56M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$23.39
Change-$0.39 (-1.64%)
Volume$6.27K
Net Assets11.15M
CUT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. DMAT commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 35.6M vs. DMAT (11.1M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: DMAT (66.918) vs CUT (-11.873). CUT was incepted earlier than DMAT: CUT (18 years) vs DMAT (4 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| CUT | DMAT | CUT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | -11.873 | 66.918 | -18% |
| Net Assets | 35.6M | 11.1M | 321% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.59 | 125% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 22.42 | 143% |
| Yield | 3.44 | 0.93 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||