Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs GMET
CUT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs GMET
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$27.65
Change-$0.08 (-0.29%)
Volume$620
Net Assets36.36M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$32.09
Change+$0.37 (+1.17%)
Volume$155
Net Assets24.04M
CUT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. GMET commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and GMET is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 36.4M vs. GMET (24M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: GMET (52.259) vs CUT (-12.425). CUT was incepted earlier than GMET: CUT (18 years) vs GMET (4 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| CUT | GMET | CUT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | -12.425 | 52.259 | -24% |
| Net Assets | 36.4M | 24M | 152% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.61 | 121% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 20.00 | 160% |
| Yield | 3.44 | 1.22 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SQM have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SQM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.05% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.14% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 18% Poorly correlated | -3.27% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
More | ||||