CUZ
Price
$30.39
Change
-$0.10 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jan 23, 03:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.52B
14 days until earnings call
SAFE
Price
$16.03
Change
-$0.09 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jan 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.46B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CUZ vs SAFE

Header iconCUZ vs SAFE Comparison
Open Charts CUZ vs SAFEBanner chart's image
Cousins Properties
Price$30.39
Change-$0.10 (-0.33%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.52B
Safehold
Price$16.03
Change-$0.09 (-0.56%)
Volume$3.88K
Capitalization1.46B
CUZ vs SAFE Comparison Chart
Loading...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUZ vs. SAFE commentary
Jan 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUZ is a Hold and SAFE is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CUZ: $30.49 vs. SAFE: $16.12)
Brand notoriety: CUZ and SAFE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUZ: 74% vs. SAFE: 101%
Market capitalization -- CUZ: $3.52B vs. SAFE: $1.46B
CUZ [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.52B. SAFE’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAFE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAFE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUZ is a better buy in the long-term than SAFE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUZ’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAFE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUZ’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAFE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAFE is a better buy in the short-term than CUZ.

Price Growth

CUZ (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +1.06% price change this week, while SAFE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -4.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

CUZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

SAFE is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.61% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUZ($3.52B) has a higher market cap than SAFE($1.46B). CUZ has higher P/E ratio than SAFE: CUZ (42.09) vs SAFE (8.80). CUZ YTD gains are higher at: 0.551 vs. SAFE (-12.771). CUZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 504M vs. SAFE (140M). SAFE has more cash in the bank: 28.5M vs. CUZ (6.05M). CUZ has less debt than SAFE: CUZ (2.51B) vs SAFE (3.97B). CUZ has higher revenues than SAFE: CUZ (803M) vs SAFE (353M).
CUZSAFECUZ / SAFE
Capitalization3.52B1.46B241%
EBITDA504M140M360%
Gain YTD0.551-12.771-4%
P/E Ratio42.098.80479%
Revenue803M353M227%
Total Cash6.05M28.5M21%
Total Debt2.51B3.97B63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUZ vs SAFE: Fundamental Ratings
CUZ
SAFE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
722
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8983
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4387
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
784
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFE's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CUZ (69). This means that SAFE’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

SAFE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CUZ (100). This means that SAFE’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

SAFE's SMR Rating (83) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CUZ (89). This means that SAFE’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFE (87). This means that CUZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFE’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for SAFE (84). This means that CUZ’s stock grew significantly faster than SAFE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUZSAFE
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SAFE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LBGIX47.480.31
+0.66%
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth I
BOGSX7.660.04
+0.52%
Black Oak Emerging Technology
DDIAX14.97-0.01
-0.07%
Macquarie Wealth Builder A
HDGRX35.10-0.10
-0.28%
Hartford Dividend and Growth R3
PDARX11.38-0.11
-0.96%
Principal Diversified Real Asset R6

CUZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUZ has been closely correlated with HIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CUZ jumps, then HIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUZ
1D Price
Change %
CUZ100%
-2.18%
HIW - CUZ
87%
Closely correlated
-1.35%
BDN - CUZ
84%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
DEI - CUZ
80%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
BXP - CUZ
79%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
PDM - CUZ
78%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
More