CUZ
Price
$30.51
Change
+$0.36 (+1.19%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
41 days until earnings call
SLG
Price
$68.43
Change
+$0.13 (+0.19%)
Updated
Dec 26, 12:01 PM (EDT)
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CUZ vs SLG

Header iconCUZ vs SLG Comparison
Open Charts CUZ vs SLGBanner chart's image
Cousins Properties
Price$30.51
Change+$0.36 (+1.19%)
Volume$604.83K
CapitalizationN/A
SL Green Realty
Price$68.43
Change+$0.13 (+0.19%)
Volume$550
CapitalizationN/A
CUZ vs SLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUZ vs. SLG commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUZ is a Buy and SLG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (CUZ: $30.51 vs. SLG: $68.30)
Brand notoriety: CUZ and SLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUZ: 44% vs. SLG: 53%
Market capitalization -- CUZ: $3.52B vs. SLG: $3.57B
CUZ [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.52B. SLG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CUZ and SLG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUZ is a better buy in the short-term than SLG.

Price Growth

CUZ (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -2.46% price change this week, while SLG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -7.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

CUZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

SLG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.70% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLG($3.57B) and CUZ($3.52B) have the same market capitalization . CUZ has higher P/E ratio than SLG: CUZ (42.09) vs SLG (8.70). SLG YTD gains are higher at: 58.532 vs. CUZ (32.007). CUZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 504M vs. SLG (-206.38M). SLG has more cash in the bank: 231M vs. CUZ (6.05M). CUZ has less debt than SLG: CUZ (2.51B) vs SLG (4.42B). SLG has higher revenues than CUZ: SLG (914M) vs CUZ (803M).
CUZSLGCUZ / SLG
Capitalization3.52B3.57B99%
EBITDA504M-206.38M-244%
Gain YTD32.00758.53255%
P/E Ratio42.098.70484%
Revenue803M914M88%
Total Cash6.05M231M3%
Total Debt2.51B4.42B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUZ vs SLG: Fundamental Ratings
CUZ
SLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10078
SMR RATING
1..100
8991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
795
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLG's Valuation (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CUZ (71). This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

SLG's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CUZ (100). This means that SLG’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's SMR Rating (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (91). This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (48). This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLG (95). This means that CUZ’s stock grew significantly faster than SLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUZSLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWEBX62.230.60
+0.97%
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
HIMVX26.080.19
+0.73%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Investor
TMSIX37.080.24
+0.65%
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock S
RGSVX12.440.04
+0.32%
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc IS
FGFCX32.240.06
+0.19%
Federated Hermes International Leaders C

CUZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUZ has been closely correlated with HIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CUZ jumps, then HIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUZ
1D Price
Change %
CUZ100%
+1.19%
HIW - CUZ
87%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
DEI - CUZ
86%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
BDN - CUZ
84%
Closely correlated
+3.88%
BXP - CUZ
80%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
PDM - CUZ
78%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
More