CVALF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.09 (-3.69%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
MBIO
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:57 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

CVALF vs MBIO

Header iconCVALF vs MBIO Comparison
Open Charts CVALF vs MBIOBanner chart's image
Covalon Technologies
Price$2.35
Change-$0.09 (-3.69%)
Volume$9.83K
CapitalizationN/A
Mustang Bio
Price$0.17
Change-$0.01 (-5.56%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
CVALF vs MBIO Comparison Chart
Loading...
CVALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVALF vs. MBIO commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVALF is a Sell and MBIO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CVALF: $2.35 vs. MBIO: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: CVALF and MBIO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVALF: 51% vs. MBIO: 69%
Market capitalization -- CVALF: $64.28M vs. MBIO: $8.78M
CVALF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $64.28M. MBIO’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $8.78M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $486.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVALF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMBIO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CVALF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MBIO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVALF is a better buy in the long-term than MBIO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVALF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBIO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVALF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MBIO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBIO is a better buy in the short-term than CVALF.

Price Growth

CVALF (@Biotechnology) experienced а -7.48% price change this week, while MBIO (@Biotechnology) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -6.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

MBIO is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-6.67% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVALF($64.3M) has a higher market cap than MBIO($8.43M). CVALF YTD gains are higher at: 205.195 vs. MBIO (-86.889). CVALF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.38M vs. MBIO (-22.3M). CVALF has more cash in the bank: 9.41M vs. MBIO (3.53M). MBIO has less debt than CVALF: MBIO (983K) vs CVALF (1.08M). CVALF has higher revenues than MBIO: CVALF (29.2M) vs MBIO (0).
CVALFMBIOCVALF / MBIO
Capitalization64.3M8.43M762%
EBITDA-1.38M-22.3M6%
Gain YTD205.195-86.889-236%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue29.2M0-
Total Cash9.41M3.53M267%
Total Debt1.08M983K110%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVALF vs MBIO: Fundamental Ratings
CVALF
MBIO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8352
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
90100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3994
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVALF's Valuation (76) in the null industry is in the same range as MBIO (94) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that CVALF’s stock grew similarly to MBIO’s over the last 12 months.

CVALF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBIO (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that CVALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBIO’s over the last 12 months.

CVALF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MBIO (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that CVALF’s stock grew similarly to MBIO’s over the last 12 months.

CVALF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBIO (94) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that CVALF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBIO’s over the last 12 months.

CVALF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as MBIO (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that CVALF’s stock grew similarly to MBIO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVALFMBIO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CVALF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBIO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIHO1.90N/A
N/A
Highway Holdings Limited
ARBE1.68-0.01
-0.59%
Arbe Robotics Ltd
LECO199.15-3.26
-1.61%
Lincoln Electric Holdings
PFC27.25-0.79
-2.82%
Premier Financial Corp
MCY70.56-2.30
-3.16%
Mercury General Corp

CVALF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVALF and SMMT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVALF and SMMT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVALF
1D Price
Change %
CVALF100%
-3.69%
SMMT - CVALF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
GNFT - CVALF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.68%
AKBLF - CVALF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TARA - CVALF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
MBIO - CVALF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.84%
More

MBIO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBIO has been closely correlated with SLRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBIO jumps, then SLRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBIO
1D Price
Change %
MBIO100%
-4.84%
SLRX - MBIO
71%
Closely correlated
-4.06%
MDGL - MBIO
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
ORMP - MBIO
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
AXON - MBIO
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.09%
CYTK - MBIO
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.53%
More