Advertisement
CVBF vs NEO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVBF is a Buy and NEO is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CVBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NEO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CVBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NEO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CVBF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.78% price change this week, while NEO (@Medical Specialties) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.94%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
CVBF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
NEO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.09% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Medical Specialties (+1.59% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| CVBF | NEO | CVBF / NEO | |
| Capitalization | 2.49B | 2.01B | 124% |
| EBITDA | N/A | -17.61M | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.314 | -54.612 | 23% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.95 | 49.50 | 22% |
| Revenue | 547M | 592M | 92% |
| Total Cash | 231M | 415M | 56% |
| Total Debt | 2.07B | 612M | 338% |
CVBF | NEO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CVBF's Valuation (68) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NEO (73) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CVBF’s stock grew similarly to NEO’s over the last 12 months.
CVBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NEO (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CVBF’s stock grew similarly to NEO’s over the last 12 months.
CVBF's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for NEO (91) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CVBF’s stock grew significantly faster than NEO’s over the last 12 months.
CVBF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NEO (90) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CVBF’s stock grew similarly to NEO’s over the last 12 months.
CVBF's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for NEO (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that CVBF’s stock grew significantly faster than NEO’s over the last 12 months.
| CVBF | NEO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 59% | 9 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | N/A |
Advertisement
CVBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVBF has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVBF jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVBF | 100% | +0.98% | ||
| HOPE - CVBF | 90% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
| BANR - CVBF | 90% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| UBSI - CVBF | 90% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| CATY - CVBF | 89% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| TRMK - CVBF | 89% Closely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||