CVGW
Price
$26.62
Change
-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
487.37M
4 days until earnings call
MTTWF
Price
$6.10
Change
+$0.65 (+11.93%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVGW vs MTTWF

Header iconCVGW vs MTTWF Comparison
Open Charts CVGW vs MTTWFBanner chart's image
Calavo Growers
Price$26.62
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
Volume$1.43K
Capitalization487.37M
METRO AG
Price$6.10
Change+$0.65 (+11.93%)
Volume$1.14K
Capitalization3.16B
CVGW vs MTTWF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CVGW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVGW vs. MTTWF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVGW is a StrongBuy and MTTWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CVGW: $26.61 vs. MTTWF: $6.10)
Brand notoriety: CVGW and MTTWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVGW: 96% vs. MTTWF: 23%
Market capitalization -- CVGW: $487.37M vs. MTTWF: $3.16B
CVGW [@Food Distributors] is valued at $487.37M. MTTWF’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $3.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $40.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVGW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTTWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVGW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTTWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTTWF is a better buy in the long-term than CVGW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVGW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CVGW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CVGW (@Food Distributors) experienced а -1.11% price change this week, while MTTWF (@Food Distributors) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +109.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CVGW is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-1.18% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTTWF($3.16B) has a higher market cap than CVGW($487M). CVGW has higher P/E ratio than MTTWF: CVGW (105.26) vs MTTWF (15.15). MTTWF YTD gains are higher at: 14.662 vs. CVGW (6.439). MTTWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. CVGW (18.1M). MTTWF has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. CVGW (5.66M). CVGW has less debt than MTTWF: CVGW (71.1M) vs MTTWF (4.13B). MTTWF has higher revenues than CVGW: MTTWF (30.9B) vs CVGW (967M).
CVGWMTTWFCVGW / MTTWF
Capitalization487M3.16B15%
EBITDA18.1M1.43B1%
Gain YTD6.43914.66244%
P/E Ratio105.2615.15695%
Revenue967M30.9B3%
Total Cash5.66M1.03B1%
Total Debt71.1M4.13B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVGW vs MTTWF: Fundamental Ratings
CVGW
MTTWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
744
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4747
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTTWF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CVGW (89) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MTTWF’s stock grew significantly faster than CVGW’s over the last 12 months.

MTTWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CVGW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MTTWF’s stock grew similarly to CVGW’s over the last 12 months.

CVGW's SMR Rating (83) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MTTWF (91) in the null industry. This means that CVGW’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

CVGW's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MTTWF (47) in the null industry. This means that CVGW’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

CVGW's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MTTWF (98) in the null industry. This means that CVGW’s stock grew similarly to MTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVGW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVGW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MPGSX11.17N/A
N/A
MassMutual Disciplined Gr R5
FVLCX19.39N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value Leaders C
TEQPX11.81N/A
N/A
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq Idx Prem
DCUIX13.45N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI US Inst
WOFRX59.91N/A
N/A
Allspring Opportunity R6

CVGW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVGW has been loosely correlated with AVO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVGW jumps, then AVO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVGW
1D Price
Change %
CVGW100%
-1.59%
AVO - CVGW
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.86%
ANDE - CVGW
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
UNFI - CVGW
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
USFD - CVGW
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.78%
SPTN - CVGW
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
More

MTTWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MTTWF and DIT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MTTWF and DIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTTWF
1D Price
Change %
MTTWF100%
N/A
DIT - MTTWF
11%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
CHEF - MTTWF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
SYY - MTTWF
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
CVGW - MTTWF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
UNFI - MTTWF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.82%
More