It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVLT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUBER’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVLT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBER’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CVLT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.52% price change this week, while UBER (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.38%.
CVLT is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
UBER is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CVLT | UBER | CVLT / UBER | |
| Capitalization | 5.36B | 146B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 106M | 6.11B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | 3.725 | -12.324 | -30% |
| P/E Ratio | 82.30 | 17.78 | 463% |
| Revenue | 1.18B | 53.7B | 2% |
| Total Cash | 900M | 6.09B | 15% |
| Total Debt | 918M | 12.4B | 7% |
CVLT | UBER | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 26 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UBER's Valuation (88) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CVLT (100). This means that UBER’s stock grew similarly to CVLT’s over the last 12 months.
UBER's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CVLT (70). This means that UBER’s stock grew similarly to CVLT’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT's SMR Rating (23) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as UBER (26). This means that CVLT’s stock grew similarly to UBER’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as UBER (61). This means that CVLT’s stock grew similarly to UBER’s over the last 12 months.
UBER's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVLT (75). This means that UBER’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVLT’s over the last 12 months.
| CVLT | UBER | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 14 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SMUP | 9.11 | 1.85 | +25.48% |
| T-REX 2X Long SMR Daily Target ETF | |||
| NAIL | 45.75 | 4.18 | +10.06% |
| Direxion Daily Hmbldrs&Supls Bull 3X ETF | |||
| UCC | 48.09 | 1.41 | +3.03% |
| ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary | |||
| CGGR | 46.96 | 0.87 | +1.89% |
| Capital Group Growth ETF | |||
| BUFT | 25.93 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allctn Dfnsv ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVLT has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVLT jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVLT | 100% | +2.31% | ||
| SNPS - CVLT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| FFIV - CVLT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| CRWD - CVLT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| PANW - CVLT | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| NTNX - CVLT | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||