CVPBF
Price
$1.50
Change
-$0.13 (-7.98%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
16.64B
CVPUF
Price
$1.33
Change
-$0.36 (-21.30%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
16.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVPBF vs CVPUF

Header iconCVPBF vs CVPUF Comparison
Open Charts CVPBF vs CVPUFBanner chart's image
C.P. All Public
Price$1.50
Change-$0.13 (-7.98%)
Volume$7.12K
Capitalization16.64B
C.P. All Public
Price$1.33
Change-$0.36 (-21.30%)
Volume$134.8K
Capitalization16.64B
CVPBF vs CVPUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CVPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVPBF vs. CVPUF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To understand the difference between CP ALL Public Company Limited - Ordinary Shares (Alien Market) (CVPBF) vs. CP ALL Public Company Limited - NVDR (CVPUF) it is enough to know the definitions of Ordinary Shares (Alien Market) and NVDR

Ordinary Shares (Alien Market) - The security represents ordinary shares listed on foreign exchange.

NVDR - Non-voting depositary receipt (NVDR) is a security issued by Thai NVDR Ltd and listed on the main board of the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). The instrument is an alternative option for foreign investors who face foreign ownership restrictions regulated under Thai law. NVDRs holders are entitled to receive the same financial benefits as they would receive if they invested directly in shares (i.e. dividends, rights, and warrants) but there are no voting rights. NVDR can be issued for an ordinary share, preference share, transferable subscription right (TSR) or warrant.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CVPBF: $1.50 vs. CVPUF: $1.33)
Brand notoriety: CVPBF and CVPUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVPBF: 243% vs. CVPUF: 636%
Market capitalization -- CVPBF: $16.64B vs. CVPUF: $16.64B
CVPBF [@Food Retail] is valued at $16.64B. CVPUF’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $16.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $41.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVPBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCVPUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVPBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CVPUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CVPBF and CVPUF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVPBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CVPUF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVPBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CVPUF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CVPBF is a better buy in the short-term than CVPUF.

Price Growth

CVPBF (@Food Retail) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CVPUF (@Food Retail) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+2.21% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVPBF($16.6B) and CVPUF($16.6B) have the same market capitalization . CVPBF (43.48) and CVPUF (42.92) have similar P/E ratio . CVPBF YTD gains are higher at: -16.389 vs. CVPUF (-33.500). CVPBF (74.9B) and CVPUF (74.9B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CVPBF (43.7B) and CVPUF (43.7B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CVPBF (433B) and CVPUF (433B) have identical debt. CVPBF (851B) and CVPUF (851B) have equivalent revenues.
CVPBFCVPUFCVPBF / CVPUF
Capitalization16.6B16.6B100%
EBITDA74.9B74.9B100%
Gain YTD-16.389-33.50049%
P/E Ratio43.4842.92101%
Revenue851B851B100%
Total Cash43.7B43.7B100%
Total Debt433B433B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVPBF vs CVPUF: Fundamental Ratings
CVPBF
CVPUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3396
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
4343
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8387
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9693
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVPUF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CVPBF (24). This means that CVPUF’s stock grew similarly to CVPBF’s over the last 12 months.

CVPUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CVPBF (100). This means that CVPUF’s stock grew similarly to CVPBF’s over the last 12 months.

CVPUF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CVPBF (43). This means that CVPUF’s stock grew similarly to CVPBF’s over the last 12 months.

CVPBF's Price Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CVPUF (87). This means that CVPBF’s stock grew similarly to CVPUF’s over the last 12 months.

CVPUF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CVPBF (96). This means that CVPUF’s stock grew similarly to CVPBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVPBFCVPUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CVPUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDVG42.810.27
+0.65%
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
EFA89.520.28
+0.31%
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
AGNG32.090.07
+0.22%
Global X Aging Population ETF
KBUF30.64N/A
N/A
KraneShares 90% KWEB Dfnd Outcm Jan27ETF
FTSD90.50-0.07
-0.08%
Franklin Short Duration US Govt ETF

CVPBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVPBF and CUYTF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVPBF and CUYTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVPBF
1D Price
Change %
CVPBF100%
N/A
CUYTF - CVPBF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRRFY - CVPBF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
CUYTY - CVPBF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRERF - CVPBF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADRNY - CVPBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
More

CVPUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVPUF and ADRNY have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVPUF and ADRNY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVPUF
1D Price
Change %
CVPUF100%
N/A
ADRNY - CVPUF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
DFILF - CVPUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRERF - CVPUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVPBF - CVPUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CPPCY - CVPUF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More