Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVSCX vs WMNAX
CVSCX vs WMNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVSCX vs. WMNAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVSCX is a Hold and WMNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVSCX has more cash in the bank: 16.9B vs. WMNAX (129M). WMNAX pays higher dividends than CVSCX: WMNAX (2.23) vs CVSCX (0.92). CVSCX was incepted earlier than WMNAX: CVSCX (26 years) vs WMNAX (6 years). CVSCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than WMNAX (1.33). WMNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. CVSCX (35.00). WMNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVSCX: WMNAX (1000) vs CVSCX (2500). WMNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. CVSCX (6.15). WMNAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.71 vs. CVSCX (15.99).
| CVSCX | WMNAX | CVSCX / WMNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.10 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.33 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.970 | 6.586 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.9B | 129M | 13,101% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 2.23 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.15 | 7.09 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.67 | 22.30 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.99 | 23.71 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement