Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVTCX vs RGQFX
CVTCX vs RGQFX Comparison
Open Charts CVTCX vs RGQFX
Calamos Growth & Income C
Price$56.32
Change+$0.18 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.24B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R5E
Price$21.92
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.53B
CVTCX vs RGQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVTCX vs. RGQFX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVTCX is a StrongBuy and RGQFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGQFX has more cash in the bank: 20.5B vs. CVTCX (3.24B). RGQFX pays higher dividends than CVTCX: RGQFX (1.76) vs CVTCX (0.24). CVTCX was incepted earlier than RGQFX: CVTCX (29 years) vs RGQFX (10 years). CVTCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RGQFX (0.47). CVTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RGQFX (10.00). RGQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVTCX: RGQFX (250) vs CVTCX (2500). CVTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.68 vs. RGQFX (12.81). CVTCX return over 5 years is better than : 48.31 vs. RGQFX (45.57).
| CVTCX | RGQFX | CVTCX / RGQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.47 | 383% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.47 | 383% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.183 | 16.489 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.24B | 20.5B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.76 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.68 | 12.81 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.43 | 56.51 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.31 | 45.57 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement