CVVUF
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.01 (-1.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
121.58M
DAUGF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVVUF vs DAUGF

Header iconCVVUF vs DAUGF Comparison
Open Charts CVVUF vs DAUGFBanner chart's image
CanAlaska Uranium
Price$0.65
Change-$0.01 (-1.52%)
Volume$20.93K
Capitalization121.58M
Desert Gold Ventures
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.3K
Capitalization12.76M
CVVUF vs DAUGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CVVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVVUF vs. DAUGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVVUF is a StrongBuy and DAUGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CVVUF: $0.65 vs. DAUGF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CVVUF and DAUGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVVUF: 14% vs. DAUGF: 67%
Market capitalization -- CVVUF: $121.58M vs. DAUGF: $12.76M
CVVUF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $121.58M. DAUGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVVUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDAUGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CVVUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DAUGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVVUF is a better buy in the long-term than DAUGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVVUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DAUGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVVUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DAUGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CVVUF is a better buy in the short-term than DAUGF.

Price Growth

CVVUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.52% price change this week, while DAUGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVVUF($122M) has a higher market cap than DAUGF($12.8M). DAUGF YTD gains are higher at: 52.404 vs. CVVUF (30.745). DAUGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.37M vs. CVVUF (-9.86M). CVVUF has more cash in the bank: 26.3M vs. DAUGF (358K). CVVUF (0) and DAUGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CVVUFDAUGFCVVUF / DAUGF
Capitalization122M12.8M953%
EBITDA-9.86M-2.37M416%
Gain YTD30.74552.40459%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash26.3M358K7,346%
Total Debt711KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVVUF vs DAUGF: Fundamental Ratings
CVVUF
DAUGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
788
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
43100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4757
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVVUF's Valuation (68) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (86). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CVVUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DAUGF (100). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CVVUF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CVVUF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (57). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

CVVUF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as DAUGF (100). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew similarly to DAUGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVVUFDAUGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DAUGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZURVY36.100.10
+0.28%
Zurich Insurance Group Ltd
HMTXF0.07N/A
N/A
Hemostemix Inc
KNTPF0.26N/A
N/A
KINTOR PHARMACEUTICAL LTD.
ELRXF5.95N/A
N/A
AB Electrolux
RANJF37.40N/A
N/A
Randstad NV

CVVUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVVUF and CGMLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVVUF and CGMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVVUF
1D Price
Change %
CVVUF100%
-1.37%
CGMLF - CVVUF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
LIFFF - CVVUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KLDCF - CVVUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
DAUGF - CVVUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXOXF - CVVUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-8.85%
More

DAUGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DAUGF and LRAXF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DAUGF and LRAXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAUGF
1D Price
Change %
DAUGF100%
N/A
LRAXF - DAUGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+4.94%
JZRIF - DAUGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - DAUGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTCDF - DAUGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GEODF - DAUGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.84%
More