CVWFF vs FPRGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVWFF is a Hold and FPRGF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVWFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFPRGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CVWFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FPRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVWFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPRGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CVWFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- FPRGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CVWFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.02% price change this week, while FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -12.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.60%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.58% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| CVWFF | FPRGF | CVWFF / FPRGF | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 33.8M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | -2.32M | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.882 | 147.059 | 6% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 6.78M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 32.3M | - |
CVWFF | FPRGF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 90 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FPRGF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVWFF (100). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVWFF’s over the last 12 months.
FPRGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CVWFF (90). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to CVWFF’s over the last 12 months.
FPRGF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CVWFF (98). This means that FPRGF’s stock grew similarly to CVWFF’s over the last 12 months.
CVWFF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as FPRGF (65). This means that CVWFF’s stock grew similarly to FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.
CVWFF's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPRGF (100). This means that CVWFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPRGF’s over the last 12 months.
| CVWFF | FPRGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
CVWFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVWFF has been loosely correlated with SNLGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVWFF jumps, then SNLGF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVWFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVWFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SNLGF - CVWFF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WTRNF - CVWFF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LRSRF - CVWFF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PMYLF - CVWFF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NRGYF - CVWFF | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.36% | ||
More | ||||
FPRGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FPRGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPRGF | 100% | +13.70% | ||
| DCNNF - FPRGF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CVWFF - FPRGF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KGLLF - FPRGF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CASXF - FPRGF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SAIDF - FPRGF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||