CVWFF
Price
$0.70
Change
-$0.01 (-1.41%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
103.58M
MLXEF
Price
$0.37
Change
-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
330.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVWFF vs MLXEF

Header iconCVWFF vs MLXEF Comparison
Open Charts CVWFF vs MLXEFBanner chart's image
CVW SUSTAINABLE ROYALTIES
Price$0.70
Change-$0.01 (-1.41%)
Volume$150
Capitalization103.58M
Metals X
Price$0.37
Change-$0.01 (-2.63%)
Volume$44.36K
Capitalization330.99M
CVWFF vs MLXEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CVWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVWFF vs. MLXEF commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVWFF is a Hold and MLXEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CVWFF: $0.70 vs. MLXEF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: CVWFF and MLXEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVWFF: 2% vs. MLXEF: 79%
Market capitalization -- CVWFF: $103.58M vs. MLXEF: $330.99M
CVWFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $103.58M. MLXEF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $330.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVWFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLXEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CVWFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLXEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLXEF is a better buy in the long-term than CVWFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVWFF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLXEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVWFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • MLXEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MLXEF is a better buy in the short-term than CVWFF.

Price Growth

CVWFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLXEF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -13.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +107.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLXEF($331M) has a higher market cap than CVWFF($104M). MLXEF YTD gains are higher at: 33.883 vs. CVWFF (13.264). MLXEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.4M vs. CVWFF (-3.72M). MLXEF has higher revenues than CVWFF: MLXEF (186M) vs CVWFF (0).
CVWFFMLXEFCVWFF / MLXEF
Capitalization104M331M31%
EBITDA-3.72M37.4M-10%
Gain YTD13.26433.88339%
P/E RatioN/A4.98-
Revenue0186M-
Total Cash4.6MN/A-
Total Debt3.86KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVWFF vs MLXEF: Fundamental Ratings
CVWFF
MLXEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2473
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7655
SMR RATING
1..100
9680
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4299
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLXEF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVWFF (100). This means that MLXEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVWFF’s over the last 12 months.

MLXEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CVWFF (76). This means that MLXEF’s stock grew similarly to CVWFF’s over the last 12 months.

MLXEF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CVWFF (96). This means that MLXEF’s stock grew similarly to CVWFF’s over the last 12 months.

MLXEF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as CVWFF (59). This means that MLXEF’s stock grew similarly to CVWFF’s over the last 12 months.

CVWFF's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLXEF (99). This means that CVWFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLXEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVWFFMLXEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHLDF0.14N/A
+0.76%
Immutable Holdings Inc.
HLFFF8.75N/A
N/A
Hellofresh SE
TGMGF0.21N/A
N/A
Theta Gold Mines Limited
BAESY96.26-0.91
-0.94%
BAE Systems PLC
TMICY54.93-0.84
-1.51%
Trend Micro Inc.

CVWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVWFF has been loosely correlated with SNLGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVWFF jumps, then SNLGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVWFF
1D Price
Change %
CVWFF100%
N/A
SNLGF - CVWFF
41%
Loosely correlated
+29.31%
WTRNF - CVWFF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMYLF - CVWFF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRGYF - CVWFF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPRGF - CVWFF
25%
Poorly correlated
-12.50%
More

MLXEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLXEF and ULTHF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLXEF and ULTHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLXEF
1D Price
Change %
MLXEF100%
-1.33%
ULTHF - MLXEF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
PPZRF - MLXEF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - MLXEF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLGCF - MLXEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRDF - MLXEF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
More