Advertisement
CWAFF vs GWRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWAFF is a Hold and GWRS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWAFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGWRS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CWAFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GWRS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GWRS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GWRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CWAFF (@Water Utilities) experienced а -10.74% price change this week, while GWRS (@Water Utilities) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Water Utilities industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
GWRS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Water Utilities (+1.44% weekly)Water utilities operate water treatment plants, and/or distribute water to residential and commercial customers. Companies operating in this industry are largely responsible for the safe and timely distribution of water. While most water systems are local or regional, some of the companies might have operations across several states. The industry is expected to be closely monitored by regulators for quality checks on the water being distributed. Investing in upgrading infrastructure is a major factor in bolstering the supply of clean/safe-to-use water. Given the absolute necessity of water in our lives, the industry is largely non-cyclical. American Water Works Company, Inc., Aqua America, Inc., American States Water Co. and California Water Service Group are some of the major water utilities companies in the U.S.
| CWAFF | GWRS | CWAFF / GWRS | |
| Capitalization | 1.38B | 315M | 439% |
| EBITDA | 4.37B | 27.5M | 15,887% |
| Gain YTD | 41.478 | -8.821 | -470% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.26 | 39.48 | 13% |
| Revenue | 13.3B | 53M | 25,094% |
| Total Cash | 7.35B | 3.09M | 238,063% |
| Total Debt | 22.6B | 109M | 20,734% |
CWAFF | GWRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 98 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CWAFF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWRS (86) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that CWAFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWRS’s over the last 12 months.
GWRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Water Utilities industry is in the same range as CWAFF (93) in the null industry. This means that GWRS’s stock grew similarly to CWAFF’s over the last 12 months.
CWAFF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as GWRS (72) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that CWAFF’s stock grew similarly to GWRS’s over the last 12 months.
CWAFF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as GWRS (74) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that CWAFF’s stock grew similarly to GWRS’s over the last 12 months.
CWAFF's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWRS (55) in the Water Utilities industry. This means that CWAFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GWRS’s over the last 12 months.
| GWRS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% |
Advertisement
CWAFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CWAFF and YORW have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWAFF and YORW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWAFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWAFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| YORW - CWAFF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
| ARIS - CWAFF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| WTRG - CWAFF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| BOTRF - CWAFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GWRS - CWAFF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||
GWRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GWRS has been loosely correlated with YORW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GWRS jumps, then YORW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWRS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWRS | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| YORW - GWRS | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| CWCO - GWRS | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| AWR - GWRS | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| PCYO - GWRS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| HTO - GWRS | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||