Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWB vs FCVT
CWB vs FCVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs FCVT
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$86.56
Change+$0.50 (+0.58%)
Volume$273.17K
Net Assets4.39B
First Trust SSI Strat Convert Secs ETF
Price$40.88
Change+$0.47 (+1.16%)
Volume$23.39K
Net Assets92.16M
CWB vs FCVT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. FCVT commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Buy and FCVT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 4.39B vs. FCVT (92.2M). FCVT (13.092) and CWB (12.524) have matching annual dividend yield . CWB was incepted earlier than FCVT: CWB (16 years) vs FCVT (10 years). CWB (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FCVT (0.95). FCVT has a higher turnover CWB (30.00) vs CWB (30.00).
| CWB | FCVT | CWB / FCVT | |
| Gain YTD | 12.524 | 13.092 | 96% |
| Net Assets | 4.39B | 92.2M | 4,764% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.95 | 42% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 100.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 1.84 | 2.01 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | FCVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 19 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 54% Loosely correlated | +4.38% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| SO - CWB | -1% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | -13% Poorly correlated | +0.17% |
FCVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCVT and BTSGU have been poorly correlated (+-9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCVT and BTSGU's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCVT | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| BTSGU - FCVT | -9% Poorly correlated | +0.17% |