Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWB vs FCVT
CWB vs FCVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs FCVT
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$85.19
Change+$0.57 (+0.67%)
Volume$505
Net Assets3.97B
First Trust SSI Strat Convert Secs ETF
Price$39.78
Change+$0.18 (+0.45%)
Volume$248
Net Assets86.69M
CWB vs FCVT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. FCVT commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Buy and FCVT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 3.97B vs. FCVT (86.7M). CWB (9.655) and FCVT (9.208) have matching annual dividend yield . CWB was incepted earlier than FCVT: CWB (16 years) vs FCVT (10 years). CWB (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FCVT (0.95). FCVT has a higher turnover CWB (30.00) vs CWB (30.00).
| CWB | FCVT | CWB / FCVT | |
| Gain YTD | 9.655 | 9.208 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 3.97B | 86.7M | 4,577% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.95 | 42% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 100.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 1.99 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | FCVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| SO - CWB | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.90% |
FCVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCVT has been loosely correlated with BTSGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCVT jumps, then BTSGU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCVT | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| BTSGU - FCVT | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.31% |