Ad is loading...
CWB vs FCVT
CWB vs FCVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs FCVT
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$80.51
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
Volume$359
Net Assets3.79B
First Trust SSI Strat Convert Secs ETF
Price$37.08
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.43M
CWB vs FCVT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. FCVT commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Buy and FCVT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 3.79B vs. FCVT (70.4M). CWB has a higher annual dividend yield than FCVT: CWB (3.932) vs FCVT (1.688). CWB was incepted earlier than FCVT: CWB (16 years) vs FCVT (10 years). CWB (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FCVT (0.95). FCVT has a higher turnover CWB (30.00) vs CWB (30.00).
| CWB | FCVT | CWB / FCVT | |
| Gain YTD | 3.932 | 1.688 | 233% |
| Net Assets | 3.79B | 70.4M | 5,379% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.95 | 42% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 100.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 1.90 | 1.87 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | FCVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 52% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | +4.58% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| SO - CWB | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.52% |
FCVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCVT has been loosely correlated with BTSGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCVT jumps, then BTSGU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCVT | 100% | +1.51% | ||
| BTSGU - FCVT | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.58% |