| CWB | GCV | CWB / GCV | |
| Gain YTD | 14.821 | 17.112 | 87% |
| Net Assets | 4.61B | 84.1M | 5,478% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 1.80 | 22% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 77.00 | 42% |
| Yield | 1.73 | 1.56 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 31 years | - |
| CWB | GCV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| SO - CWB | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.12% |